Towards a Mad technoscience: revealing, repurposing, and reimagining carceral mental health technologies

Digital technologies are increasingly being used in mental health services. This includes carceral settings, where the surveillance technology Oxevision has been implemented in the bedrooms of people in psychiatric wards across the UK, Europe and the US. Mad people have drawn attention to the oppressive and violent nature of Oxevision, and the neoliberal political motivations behind the innovation scheme through which it emerged. This includes the StopOxevision campaign, started by four of this article’s authors. In this article, we draw concepts from crip technoscience together with abolitionist perspectives on technology to argue for the necessity of a Mad technoscience; an account of how Mad people – particularly those of us who are, or have been, incarcerated – resist, repurpose, and (re)imagine technologies used on us against our will. We illustrate this through three vignettes detailing Mad technoscience in practice, informed by our experiences with this technology, and our resistance against it. Ultimately, we reject the notion – mainly perpetuated by industry – that mental health technologies are, in themselves, either ‘good’ or ‘bad’; designated as such through merely ‘involving’ Mad people in their design. Rather, we understand these technologies, and our practices concerning them, as inherently entangled with the violent historical and contemporary injustices of psychiatry and its carceral tools. Subsequently, our final argument is inspired by Benjamin’s (2021) call for a radical reimagining of what technoscience might look like outside of carcerality. Here, we consider how mental health technologies could be otherwise – to avoid simply ‘tinkering Armageddon’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Justice, power and resistance
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/26352338y2025d000000045
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a Mad technoscience: revealing, repurposing, and reimagining carceral mental health technologies

Rose Powell, Naomi Head, Ellen Thomas, Hat Porter et al.
1 citations
Justice, power and resistance
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
16.49
article

Towards a Mad technoscience: revealing, repurposing, and reimagining carceral mental health technologies

Rose Powell, Naomi Head, Ellen Thomas, Hat Porter, Sophina Mariette
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Digital technologies are increasingly being used in mental health services. This includes carceral settings, where the surveillance technology Oxevision has been implemented in the bedrooms of people in psychiatric wards across the UK, Europe and the US. Mad people have drawn attention to the oppressive and violent nature of Oxevision, and the neoliberal political motivations behind the innovation scheme through which it emerged. This includes the StopOxevision campaign, started by four of this article’s authors. In this article, we draw concepts from crip technoscience together with abolitionist perspectives on technology to argue for the necessity of a Mad technoscience; an account of how Mad people – particularly those of us who are, or have been, incarcerated – resist, repurpose, and (re)imagine technologies used on us against our will. We illustrate this through three vignettes detailing Mad technoscience in practice, informed by our experiences with this technology, and our resistance against it. Ultimately, we reject the notion – mainly perpetuated by industry – that mental health technologies are, in themselves, either ‘good’ or ‘bad’; designated as such through merely ‘involving’ Mad people in their design. Rather, we understand these technologies, and our practices concerning them, as inherently entangled with the violent historical and contemporary injustices of psychiatry and its carceral tools. Subsequently, our final argument is inspired by Benjamin’s (2021) call for a radical reimagining of what technoscience might look like outside of carcerality. Here, we consider how mental health technologies could be otherwise – to avoid simply ‘tinkering Armageddon’.

Justice, power and resistanceVol. 9(1)
Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
16.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards a Mad technoscience: revealing, repurposing, and reimagining carceral mental health technologies — Rose Powell, Naomi Head, et al. · Justice, power and resistance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS