Estimating the minimal important change of WHODAS 2.0 in individuals with chronic stroke: a methodological comparison
MIC values for WHODAS 2.0 in chronic stroke differ by method. The 5.28-point threshold offered the most balanced predictive value but should be interpreted cautiously. The findings support using multiple methods and emphasize the need for patient-centered assessment and methodological consistency in MIC determination.
Authors
- Ariadne Cardoso da Silva (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4709-7933)
- Shamyr Sulyvan de Castro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2661-7899)
- Léia Cordeiro de Oliveira (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7117-2238)
- Soraia Micaela Silva (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5929-3253)
- Cid André Fidelis de Paula Gomes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6627-7537)
- Gustavo Janizello (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6893-9249)
- Bibiana Caldeira Monteiro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7719-8084)
Institutions
- Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR)
- Universidade Nove de Julho (BR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
- Published
- 2025-08-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2025.2549455
- Primary Topic
- Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior