Assessing inaugural dissection room experiences: Demographic, emotional, educational, and ethical dimensions among Tanzanian medical undergraduates (2024/2025 Cohort)

Background: Cadaveric dissection remains a vital pillar of anatomical education, providing a hands-on, three-dimensional understanding of the human body that is critical to medical training. However, in low-resource settings like Tanzania, where technological alternatives are limited, the dissection experience is intensified, both pedagogically and emotionally. Cultural beliefs, religious norms, and the lack of psychological preparation may shape students’ initial responses in underexplored ways. This study examines the demographic, emotional, educational, and ethical dimensions of cadaver dissection among first-year medical students at St. Francis University College of Health and Allied Sciences (SFUCHAS) during the 2024/2025 academic year. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted at SFUCHAS in Ifakara Town Council, Tanzania. A total of 142 first-year medical students were recruited using convenience sampling. Data were collected via a validated electronic, closed-ended questionnaire distributed after students' initial dissection session. The tool assessed demographics (age, gender, prior exposure), emotional responses (e.g., anxiety, curiosity), educational motivations, and ethical perceptions. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, ANOVA, and logistic regression analyses were performed using SPSS v28. Results: Among 142 participants, 76.1% had prior exposure to cadaver dissection. Most students (83.1%) strongly believed in the educational value of dissection, primarily for surgical skills and 3D anatomical understanding. However, 80.3% experienced ethical dilemmas, and 97.2% supported the need for emotional or psychological support. Prior exposure was significantly associated with reduced cultural/religious discomfort (χ² = 10.44, p = 0.034), and student motivation differed significantly across exposure groups (F = 4.23, p = 0.017). Logistic regression showed that peer influence significantly predicted emotional distress (OR = 2.18, p = 0.042). Conclusion: While cadaveric dissection is widely accepted and valued for its educational benefits, it elicits complex emotional and ethical reactions among Tanzanian medical students, shaped by cultural beliefs and peer dynamics. Institutions in resource-limited settings should incorporate structured psychological support, cultural sensitivity training, and preparatory sessions to enhance the dissection experience and support student well-being.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access Research Journal of Science and Technology
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53022/oarjst.2025.14.2.0106
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing inaugural dissection room experiences: Demographic, emotional, educational, and ethical dimensions among Tanzanian medical undergraduates (2024/2025 Cohort)

Rosa Morro, Seth Jotham
Open Access Research Journal of Science and Technology
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Assessing inaugural dissection room experiences: Demographic, emotional, educational, and ethical dimensions among Tanzanian medical undergraduates (2024/2025 Cohort)

Rosa Morro, Seth Jotham
article en

Abstract

Background: Cadaveric dissection remains a vital pillar of anatomical education, providing a hands-on, three-dimensional understanding of the human body that is critical to medical training. However, in low-resource settings like Tanzania, where technological alternatives are limited, the dissection experience is intensified, both pedagogically and emotionally. Cultural beliefs, religious norms, and the lack of psychological preparation may shape students’ initial responses in underexplored ways. This study examines the demographic, emotional, educational, and ethical dimensions of cadaver dissection among first-year medical students at St. Francis University College of Health and Allied Sciences (SFUCHAS) during the 2024/2025 academic year. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted at SFUCHAS in Ifakara Town Council, Tanzania. A total of 142 first-year medical students were recruited using convenience sampling. Data were collected via a validated electronic, closed-ended questionnaire distributed after students' initial dissection session. The tool assessed demographics (age, gender, prior exposure), emotional responses (e.g., anxiety, curiosity), educational motivations, and ethical perceptions. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, ANOVA, and logistic regression analyses were performed using SPSS v28. Results: Among 142 participants, 76.1% had prior exposure to cadaver dissection. Most students (83.1%) strongly believed in the educational value of dissection, primarily for surgical skills and 3D anatomical understanding. However, 80.3% experienced ethical dilemmas, and 97.2% supported the need for emotional or psychological support. Prior exposure was significantly associated with reduced cultural/religious discomfort (χ² = 10.44, p = 0.034), and student motivation differed significantly across exposure groups (F = 4.23, p = 0.017). Logistic regression showed that peer influence significantly predicted emotional distress (OR = 2.18, p = 0.042). Conclusion: While cadaveric dissection is widely accepted and valued for its educational benefits, it elicits complex emotional and ethical reactions among Tanzanian medical students, shaped by cultural beliefs and peer dynamics. Institutions in resource-limited settings should incorporate structured psychological support, cultural sensitivity training, and preparatory sessions to enhance the dissection experience and support student well-being.

Open Access Research Journal of Science and TechnologyVol. 14(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.