Comparative analysis of inflow performance relationship and pressure buildup well testing methods using the evidence from Tatneft’s fields

Background. Formation evaluation and well testing are key to meeting the challenges associated with oil and gas field development. Selection of the most efficient and informative method always involves consideration of technological and process specifics for each particular case. Objective. To present a comparative analysis of the efficiency of well testing methods to identify the optimal conditions for application of each method in terms of several criteria: test period, scope of information obtained, production losses, reservoir pressure and productivity index estimates. Materials and methods. The paper presents the results of two well testing methods: pressure buildup analysis and inflow performance relationship curves. These tests were conducted as prescheduled and according to developed test design in 16 wells equipped with sucker rod pumping unit. Results. Beneficial and negative factors for well testing procedure and performance were determined. Conclusions. The present research is based on practical field test results with comparative analysis of technological and process factors influencing well testing methods and can be used as basis for selection of tests for a particular well.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Actual Problems of Oil and Gas
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29222/ipng.2078-5712.2025.15
Primary Topic
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of inflow performance relationship and pressure buildup well testing methods using the evidence from Tatneft’s fields

Ekaterina Yachmeneva, Nikolai А. Smotrikov
Actual Problems of Oil and Gas
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
article

Comparative analysis of inflow performance relationship and pressure buildup well testing methods using the evidence from Tatneft’s fields

Ekaterina Yachmeneva, Nikolai А. Smotrikov
article en

Abstract

Background. Formation evaluation and well testing are key to meeting the challenges associated with oil and gas field development. Selection of the most efficient and informative method always involves consideration of technological and process specifics for each particular case. Objective. To present a comparative analysis of the efficiency of well testing methods to identify the optimal conditions for application of each method in terms of several criteria: test period, scope of information obtained, production losses, reservoir pressure and productivity index estimates. Materials and methods. The paper presents the results of two well testing methods: pressure buildup analysis and inflow performance relationship curves. These tests were conducted as prescheduled and according to developed test design in 16 wells equipped with sucker rod pumping unit. Results. Beneficial and negative factors for well testing procedure and performance were determined. Conclusions. The present research is based on practical field test results with comparative analysis of technological and process factors influencing well testing methods and can be used as basis for selection of tests for a particular well.

Actual Problems of Oil and GasVol. 16(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative analysis of inflow performance relationship and pressure buildup well testing methods using the evidence from Tatneft’s fields — Ekaterina Yachmeneva, Nikolai А. Smotrikov · Actual Problems of Oil and Gas (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS