Beyond the Buzzword: Interdisciplinary Education in Cultural Heritage Needs a Purpose

As the field of cultural heritage expands beyond traditional conservation to encompass legal, digital, environmental, and sociocultural dimensions, the education of future heritage professionals must evolve accordingly. While global universities increasingly adopt interdisciplinary approaches, many cultural heritage programs remain rooted in narrow disciplinary frameworks, limiting students' readiness for contemporary challenges. This paper reviews international models—such as those of University College London, Leiden University, and the University of Bologna—and identifies key trends including the integration of digital humanities, legal studies, and community-based practices. Drawing from these cases, it proposes a flexible and interdisciplinary curriculum framework tailored to China's educational landscape. Policy recommendations and implementation strategies are outlined to support institutional reform, cross-departmental collaboration, and global engagement. Ultimately, the paper argues that transforming cultural heritage education is not merely an academic goal but a cultural imperative for China in a globalized era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Education Humanities and Social Research
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71222/gg4gyh31
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the Buzzword: Interdisciplinary Education in Cultural Heritage Needs a Purpose

Qiuying Li
1 citations
Journal of Education Humanities and Social Research
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
8.27
article

Beyond the Buzzword: Interdisciplinary Education in Cultural Heritage Needs a Purpose

Qiuying Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As the field of cultural heritage expands beyond traditional conservation to encompass legal, digital, environmental, and sociocultural dimensions, the education of future heritage professionals must evolve accordingly. While global universities increasingly adopt interdisciplinary approaches, many cultural heritage programs remain rooted in narrow disciplinary frameworks, limiting students' readiness for contemporary challenges. This paper reviews international models—such as those of University College London, Leiden University, and the University of Bologna—and identifies key trends including the integration of digital humanities, legal studies, and community-based practices. Drawing from these cases, it proposes a flexible and interdisciplinary curriculum framework tailored to China's educational landscape. Policy recommendations and implementation strategies are outlined to support institutional reform, cross-departmental collaboration, and global engagement. Ultimately, the paper argues that transforming cultural heritage education is not merely an academic goal but a cultural imperative for China in a globalized era.

Journal of Education Humanities and Social ResearchVol. 2(3)
Beijing Language and Culture University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
8.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond the Buzzword: Interdisciplinary Education in Cultural Heritage Needs a Purpose — Qiuying Li · Journal of Education Humanities and Social Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS