Protein Substitute Absorption: A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing CGMP vs. Amino Acids vs. Micellar Casein in Healthy Volunteers

<b>Background</b>: The rate at which amino acids (AAs) are absorbed from casein glycomacropeptide (CGMP) when given as a protein substitute in phenylketonuria (PKU) is unknown. This three-way randomised, controlled, crossover study aimed to compare the AA absorption profile of phenylalanine (Phe)-free L-amino acids (L-AAs), low-Phe CGMP (CGMP) and casein in healthy adult subjects. <b>Methods</b>: Area under the curve (AUC) was measured over 240 minutes after ingesting one dose of each protein source on three separate occasions, under the same test conditions. A total of 0.4 g/kg protein equivalent of each test product (L-AA, CGMP and casein) was given. Fasted blood samples were collected from healthy volunteers at 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 and 240 minutes post-test. Insulin, blood urea nitrogen, glucose and total (TAAs), essential (EAAs), large neutral (LNAAs) and branch chain (BCAAs) amino acids were measured at each time point. <b>Results</b>: A total of 20 subjects (11 females), median age 43 y (range 23-49), with a median BMI 24.2 (20-30.5) were recruited. AUC was compared across groups. Statistically significant differences were noted for: AUC for TAAs and BCAAs between CGMP and L-AAs vs. casein [TAAs <i>p</i> = 0.008 and <i>p</i> = 0.03; BCAAs <i>p</i> = <0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.002]. There were no AUC differences between L-AAs and CGMP. AUC was largest for L-AAs, then CGMP and finally casein. For LNAAs, EAAs, insulin, glucose and urea, there were no statistically significant differences. There was a consistent delivery of AAs for casein demonstrated by a sustained curve, but the absorption curves for L-AAs and CGMP were transient, rising rapidly and falling, with the exception of tyrosine with CGMP which showed a gradual increase over 240 minutes in contrast to L-AAs and casein. <b>Conclusions</b>: Amino acids from CGMP and L-AAs were absorbed more rapidly than casein, inferring CGMP did not mimic casein, a slow-release protein source. The tyrosine concentration curve for CGMP suggests a beneficial effect on the Phe: tyrosine ratio. Kinetic labelled studies will help bring greater understanding on the utilisation of AAs particularly important for protein synthesis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17162671
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protein Substitute Absorption: A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing CGMP vs. Amino Acids vs. Micellar Casein in Healthy Volunteers

Jonathan Tang, Anne Daly, Alex Pinto, Anita MacDonald et al.
1 citations
Nutrients
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
1.15
article

Protein Substitute Absorption: A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing CGMP vs. Amino Acids vs. Micellar Casein in Healthy Volunteers

Jonathan Tang, Anne Daly, Alex Pinto, Anita MacDonald, Sharon Evans, Tarekegn Geberhiwot, Richard A. Jackson, J. César
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: The rate at which amino acids (AAs) are absorbed from casein glycomacropeptide (CGMP) when given as a protein substitute in phenylketonuria (PKU) is unknown. This three-way randomised, controlled, crossover study aimed to compare the AA absorption profile of phenylalanine (Phe)-free L-amino acids (L-AAs), low-Phe CGMP (CGMP) and casein in healthy adult subjects. <b>Methods</b>: Area under the curve (AUC) was measured over 240 minutes after ingesting one dose of each protein source on three separate occasions, under the same test conditions. A total of 0.4 g/kg protein equivalent of each test product (L-AA, CGMP and casein) was given. Fasted blood samples were collected from healthy volunteers at 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 and 240 minutes post-test. Insulin, blood urea nitrogen, glucose and total (TAAs), essential (EAAs), large neutral (LNAAs) and branch chain (BCAAs) amino acids were measured at each time point. <b>Results</b>: A total of 20 subjects (11 females), median age 43 y (range 23-49), with a median BMI 24.2 (20-30.5) were recruited. AUC was compared across groups. Statistically significant differences were noted for: AUC for TAAs and BCAAs between CGMP and L-AAs vs. casein [TAAs <i>p</i> = 0.008 and <i>p</i> = 0.03; BCAAs <i>p</i> = <0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.002]. There were no AUC differences between L-AAs and CGMP. AUC was largest for L-AAs, then CGMP and finally casein. For LNAAs, EAAs, insulin, glucose and urea, there were no statistically significant differences. There was a consistent delivery of AAs for casein demonstrated by a sustained curve, but the absorption curves for L-AAs and CGMP were transient, rising rapidly and falling, with the exception of tyrosine with CGMP which showed a gradual increase over 240 minutes in contrast to L-AAs and casein. <b>Conclusions</b>: Amino acids from CGMP and L-AAs were absorbed more rapidly than casein, inferring CGMP did not mimic casein, a slow-release protein source. The tyrosine concentration curve for CGMP suggests a beneficial effect on the Phe: tyrosine ratio. Kinetic labelled studies will help bring greater understanding on the utilisation of AAs particularly important for protein synthesis.

NutrientsVol. 17(16)
University of East Anglia (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB), Unidade Local de Saúde de São José (PT), Birmingham Children's Hospital (GB), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.