Balancing rigour and practicality when conducting large-scale, longitudinal audio diary studies: guidance for business and management research
Purpose This paper aims to expand the methodological toolkit by detailing an approach for conducting large-scale audio diary studies in business and management education research. The authors address two research questions: (1) How can large-scale, longitudinal audio diary studies be conducted in a way that balances rigour and practicality? (2) What methodological challenges arise when implementing a longitudinal audio diary study at scale, and how might these be addressed? Design/methodology/approach They draw on insights from a study with 128 international students in a UK business school who provided a combined 602 reflective audio diary contributions to inform a ten-step process for conducting large-scale audio diary studies. Findings They present a flexible ten-step process, discussing challenges and recommendations regarding participant engagement and retention, technology, data quality and resource demands. Originality/value They conclude with examples of four themes for future research applications of audio diary studies: employability perceptions, mental health and well-being, ethical decision-making and corporate social responsibility awareness and innovation and entrepreneurial mindset development. These research avenues represent opportunities to promote a sustainable career trajectory for individuals and offer societal benefits via a sustainable career ecosystem.
Authors
- Maria Mouratidou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8144-3537)
- William E. Donald (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3670-5374)
- Rebecca C. Padgett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6957-6097)
- Helen P.N. Hughes
Institutions
- University of Leeds (GB)
- University of Southampton (GB)
- University of Cumbria (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Management Research Review
- Published
- 2025-08-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-03-2025-0210
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Management and Organizational Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.76