Researchers’ knowledge and awareness regarding predatory publishers in Tanzanian universities

This study investigates knowledge levels, awareness regarding predatory publishers, and factors influencing researchers’ choice of publishers among Tanzanian researchers. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the study includes 201 respondents from the University of Dodoma and Sokoine University of Agriculture, combining a questionnaire for researchers with interviews with university decision-makers. The results indicate that while many respondents recognized the key features of predatory publishing, such as identifying unsolicited email invitations, there remains a significant gap in comprehensive knowledge. The interviews revealed ongoing efforts by universities to raise awareness through training sessions and resource provision. The study concludes that while there is some recognition of the key characteristics associated with predatory publishers, significant gaps remain, particularly among early career researchers. Addressing these gaps is crucial for preserving the integrity of scholarly communication within academic institutions. Enhanced educational initiatives are essential for equipping researchers with the skills needed to navigate the complexities of academic publishing effectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IFLA Journal
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352251368299
Primary Topic
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Researchers’ knowledge and awareness regarding predatory publishers in Tanzanian universities

Frankwell Dulle, Ronald Benard, Sevelina Selestine Moshi
1 links
IFLA Journal
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
article

Researchers’ knowledge and awareness regarding predatory publishers in Tanzanian universities

Frankwell Dulle, Ronald Benard, Sevelina Selestine Moshi
article en

Abstract

This study investigates knowledge levels, awareness regarding predatory publishers, and factors influencing researchers’ choice of publishers among Tanzanian researchers. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the study includes 201 respondents from the University of Dodoma and Sokoine University of Agriculture, combining a questionnaire for researchers with interviews with university decision-makers. The results indicate that while many respondents recognized the key features of predatory publishing, such as identifying unsolicited email invitations, there remains a significant gap in comprehensive knowledge. The interviews revealed ongoing efforts by universities to raise awareness through training sessions and resource provision. The study concludes that while there is some recognition of the key characteristics associated with predatory publishers, significant gaps remain, particularly among early career researchers. Addressing these gaps is crucial for preserving the integrity of scholarly communication within academic institutions. Enhanced educational initiatives are essential for equipping researchers with the skills needed to navigate the complexities of academic publishing effectively.

IFLA Journal
Sokoine University of Agriculture (TZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Researchers’ knowledge and awareness regarding predatory publishers in Tanzanian universities — Frankwell Dulle, Ronald Benard, et al. · IFLA Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS