Analysis of Consumer Intention to Reject Eco-Label Product Purchases: An Innovation Resistance Theory Approach

Eco-labeled products have grown in prominence alongside rising awareness of environmental issues. However, consumer resistance toward purchasing eco-labeled products remains a significant barrier, especially in developing countries such as Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the influence of five innovation resistance factors on the intention to resist eco-label product purchases: usage barrier, value barrier, risk barrier, traditional barrier, and image barrier. Using a quantitative approach and PLS-SEM analysis, data were collected from 213 Millennial and Gen Z respondents across major cities in Java, Indonesia. The results indicate that value barrier, traditional barrier, and image barrier have a significant positive influence on resistance, while usage barrier shows no significant effect, and risk barrier has a negative influence. Image barrier emerged as the most dominant factor. This study contributes to the extension of Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT) in the context of environmentally friendly products and offers practical implications for industry players to build credibility and improve consumer perception of eco-labeled products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Enrichment Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55324/enrichment.v3i5.469
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Consumer Intention to Reject Eco-Label Product Purchases: An Innovation Resistance Theory Approach

Adi Hendiawan, Mas Wahyu Wibiwo
Enrichment Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

Analysis of Consumer Intention to Reject Eco-Label Product Purchases: An Innovation Resistance Theory Approach

Adi Hendiawan, Mas Wahyu Wibiwo
article en

Abstract

Eco-labeled products have grown in prominence alongside rising awareness of environmental issues. However, consumer resistance toward purchasing eco-labeled products remains a significant barrier, especially in developing countries such as Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the influence of five innovation resistance factors on the intention to resist eco-label product purchases: usage barrier, value barrier, risk barrier, traditional barrier, and image barrier. Using a quantitative approach and PLS-SEM analysis, data were collected from 213 Millennial and Gen Z respondents across major cities in Java, Indonesia. The results indicate that value barrier, traditional barrier, and image barrier have a significant positive influence on resistance, while usage barrier shows no significant effect, and risk barrier has a negative influence. Image barrier emerged as the most dominant factor. This study contributes to the extension of Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT) in the context of environmentally friendly products and offers practical implications for industry players to build credibility and improve consumer perception of eco-labeled products.

Enrichment Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and DevelopmentVol. 3(5)
Mercu Buana University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis of Consumer Intention to Reject Eco-Label Product Purchases: An Innovation Resistance Theory Approach — Adi Hendiawan, Mas Wahyu Wibiwo · Enrichment Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS