Comparison of Lumerical FDTD and Tidy3D for three-dimensional FDTD simulations of passive silicon photonic components

We benchmark Lumerical FDTD and Tidy3D for 3D simulations of passive silicon photonic components on the silicon-on-insulator (SOI) platform. Six devices—including an MMI, directional coupler, waveguide crossing, mode converter, polarization splitter rotator, and ring resonator—are simulated under matched conditions using geometries from the generic process design kit (PDK) from GDSFactory. Our study emphasizes comparing simulation accuracy across both solvers, alongside an analysis of runtime and broadband behavior over varying resolutions and bandwidths. Results show that both solvers are reliable with minimal discrepancies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Optics Continuum
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1364/optcon.572107
Primary Topic
Photonic and Optical Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Lumerical FDTD and Tidy3D for three-dimensional FDTD simulations of passive silicon photonic components

Zuyang Liu, Joyce K. S. Poon
Optics Continuum
Photonic and Optical Devices
article

Comparison of Lumerical FDTD and Tidy3D for three-dimensional FDTD simulations of passive silicon photonic components

Zuyang Liu, Joyce K. S. Poon
article en

Abstract

We benchmark Lumerical FDTD and Tidy3D for 3D simulations of passive silicon photonic components on the silicon-on-insulator (SOI) platform. Six devices—including an MMI, directional coupler, waveguide crossing, mode converter, polarization splitter rotator, and ring resonator—are simulated under matched conditions using geometries from the generic process design kit (PDK) from GDSFactory. Our study emphasizes comparing simulation accuracy across both solvers, alongside an analysis of runtime and broadband behavior over varying resolutions and bandwidths. Results show that both solvers are reliable with minimal discrepancies.

Optics ContinuumVol. 4(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Photonic and Optical Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.