Informing soil compaction research priorities with farmer focus groups in the United States

• Farmers request soil compaction assessment tools applicable at field scales. • Farmers request additional practices besides tillage for soil compaction management. • Misconceptions and concerns about controlled traffic farming limit its adoption. • Research and demonstration of successful management of soil compaction is needed. Soil compaction is a widespread form of soil degradation that impacts soil functions and ecosystem services by limiting plant growth, reducing farm profitability, and impeding efforts to improve soil health. While mechanisms by which soil compaction occurs are widely understood, little has improved regarding its management in agroecosystems in the last century. Here, to better inform scientists of farmers’ soil compaction research needs, we implemented focus groups in six growing regions across Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin. In each focus group, farmers completed surveys and participated in guided discussions centered on their soil compaction perceptions, experiences, and ideas. We evaluated surveys and discussion transcripts with quantitative (summary statistics) and qualitative (thematic coding) analyses to assess participants’ observations, questions, and possible management solutions. Results from this work indicate that knowledge gaps, especially regarding identification of critical thresholds for soil compaction at field scale and management options and their efficacies, influence farmers’ adoption of soil compaction management practices. Based on the needs identified in this study, key priorities for soil compaction research and education should include (1) techniques for assessing soil compaction at field scale, including both its presence and thresholds for management, (2) addressing knowledge gaps about controlled traffic farming, tillage, and crops, and (3) continued research and development of requested technologies and practices, including drones, amendments, and cover or perennial crops.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Security
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soisec.2025.100200
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Soil Management and Crop Yield
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Informing soil compaction research priorities with farmer focus groups in the United States

Jerry D. Clark, Natalie Sturm, Haly Neely, Kelly R. Wilson et al.
4 citations
Soil Security
Soil Management and Crop Yield
4.74
article

Informing soil compaction research priorities with farmer focus groups in the United States

Jerry D. Clark, Natalie Sturm, Haly Neely, Kelly R. Wilson, A. Esser, Reagan L. Noland, David Drake, Francisco J. Arriaga, T. R. Waters, Natasha Paris, Jordan Kampa
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• Farmers request soil compaction assessment tools applicable at field scales. • Farmers request additional practices besides tillage for soil compaction management. • Misconceptions and concerns about controlled traffic farming limit its adoption. • Research and demonstration of successful management of soil compaction is needed. Soil compaction is a widespread form of soil degradation that impacts soil functions and ecosystem services by limiting plant growth, reducing farm profitability, and impeding efforts to improve soil health. While mechanisms by which soil compaction occurs are widely understood, little has improved regarding its management in agroecosystems in the last century. Here, to better inform scientists of farmers’ soil compaction research needs, we implemented focus groups in six growing regions across Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin. In each focus group, farmers completed surveys and participated in guided discussions centered on their soil compaction perceptions, experiences, and ideas. We evaluated surveys and discussion transcripts with quantitative (summary statistics) and qualitative (thematic coding) analyses to assess participants’ observations, questions, and possible management solutions. Results from this work indicate that knowledge gaps, especially regarding identification of critical thresholds for soil compaction at field scale and management options and their efficacies, influence farmers’ adoption of soil compaction management practices. Based on the needs identified in this study, key priorities for soil compaction research and education should include (1) techniques for assessing soil compaction at field scale, including both its presence and thresholds for management, (2) addressing knowledge gaps about controlled traffic farming, tillage, and crops, and (3) continued research and development of requested technologies and practices, including drones, amendments, and cover or perennial crops.

Soil SecurityVol. 20
University of Wisconsin System (US), Washington Department of Natural Resources (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Wisconsin–Extension (US), East Texas A&M University (US), Soil Science Society of America (US), Angelo State University (US), King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks (US), Washington State University (US), University of Missouri (US)
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Soil Management and Crop Yield
4.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.