Theoretical physics benchmark (TPBench)—a dataset and study of AI reasoning capabilities in theoretical physics

Abstract We introduce a benchmark to evaluate the capability of AI to solve problems in theoretical physics (TP), focusing on high-energy theory and cosmology. The first iteration of our benchmark consists of 57 problems of varying difficulty, from undergraduate to research level. These problems are novel in the sense that they do not come from public problem collections. We evaluate our data set on various open and closed language models, including o3-mini, o1, DeepSeek-R1, GPT-4o and versions of Llama and Qwen. While we find impressive progress in model performance with the most recent models, our research-level difficulty problems are mostly unsolved. We address challenges of auto-verifiability and grading, and discuss common failure modes. While currently state-of-the art models are still of limited use for researchers, our results show that AI assisted TP research may become possible in the near future. We discuss the main obstacles towards this goal and possible strategies to overcome them. The public problems and solutions, results for various models, and updates to the data set and score distribution, are available on the website of the dataset tpbench.org .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/adfcb0
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theoretical physics benchmark (TPBench)—a dataset and study of AI reasoning capabilities in theoretical physics

Moritz Münchmeyer, Sai Chaitanya Tadepalli, Tianyi Li, Maja Rudolph et al.
3 citations
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Machine Learning and Data Classification
7.44
article

Theoretical physics benchmark (TPBench)—a dataset and study of AI reasoning capabilities in theoretical physics

Moritz Münchmeyer, Sai Chaitanya Tadepalli, Tianyi Li, Maja Rudolph, Daniel J. H. Chung, Yurii Kvasiuk, Frédéric Sala, Zhiqi Gao
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract We introduce a benchmark to evaluate the capability of AI to solve problems in theoretical physics (TP), focusing on high-energy theory and cosmology. The first iteration of our benchmark consists of 57 problems of varying difficulty, from undergraduate to research level. These problems are novel in the sense that they do not come from public problem collections. We evaluate our data set on various open and closed language models, including o3-mini, o1, DeepSeek-R1, GPT-4o and versions of Llama and Qwen. While we find impressive progress in model performance with the most recent models, our research-level difficulty problems are mostly unsolved. We address challenges of auto-verifiability and grading, and discuss common failure modes. While currently state-of-the art models are still of limited use for researchers, our results show that AI assisted TP research may become possible in the near future. We discuss the main obstacles towards this goal and possible strategies to overcome them. The public problems and solutions, results for various models, and updates to the data set and score distribution, are available on the website of the dataset tpbench.org .

Machine Learning Science and TechnologyVol. 6(3)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Simons Foundation (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, High Energy Physics
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.