Lunate extract: fully automatic acetabular lunate segmentation and hip angle measurements

BackgroundComputed tomography (CT)-derived acetabular angles are commonly used in the diagnosis of hip dysplasia, but the measurements are labor-intensive, with higher inter- and intra-operator variation, necessitating an automated method.PurposeTo develop and validate an automatic method for segmenting the acetabular lunate surface and measure diagnostic angles using CT images to improve diagnosis and preoperative planning for patients with hip dysplasia.Material and MethodsWe developed a method to segment the acetabular lunate surface, automatically identify five landmark points (center, anterior, posterior, lateral, and medial) and calculate diagnostic angles for center-edge (CE), anterior-sector (AASA), posterior-sector (PASA), acetabular anteversion (AcAV), and acetabular-index (AI). The method was validated against repeated manual measurements by three raters on a dataset of 18 patients (36 hips).ResultsNo differences between raters and the automatic method for the center (<i>P</i> = 0.18), anterior (<i>P</i> = 0.55), posterior (<i>P</i> = 0.18), lateral (<i>P</i> = 0.13), and medial (<i>P</i> = 0.12) landmarks. No statistically significant differences were observed between raters and the automatic method for the AASA (<i>P</i> = 0.01) and PASA (<i>P</i> = 0.08) angles. Statistically significant differences were found between the automatic method and rater 3 for the CE and AI angles, and between the automatic method and rater 2 for the AcAV angle. The ICC for all angle measurements by raters and the automated method was in the range of 0.90-0.99.ConclusionWith similar agreement between manual and automatic measurements, the automatic method provides important information that may be used for both diagnosis and surgical planning, with the potential to greatly reduce the time used for analysis per patient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Radiologica
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251359649
Primary Topic
Hip disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lunate extract: fully automatic acetabular lunate segmentation and hip angle measurements

A. Bentzen, Sepp de Raedt, Marleen de Bruijne, Maiken Stilling et al.
Acta Radiologica
Hip disorders and treatments
article

Lunate extract: fully automatic acetabular lunate segmentation and hip angle measurements

A. Bentzen, Sepp de Raedt, Marleen de Bruijne, Maiken Stilling, Inger Mechlenburg, Lone Rømer
article en

Abstract

BackgroundComputed tomography (CT)-derived acetabular angles are commonly used in the diagnosis of hip dysplasia, but the measurements are labor-intensive, with higher inter- and intra-operator variation, necessitating an automated method.PurposeTo develop and validate an automatic method for segmenting the acetabular lunate surface and measure diagnostic angles using CT images to improve diagnosis and preoperative planning for patients with hip dysplasia.Material and MethodsWe developed a method to segment the acetabular lunate surface, automatically identify five landmark points (center, anterior, posterior, lateral, and medial) and calculate diagnostic angles for center-edge (CE), anterior-sector (AASA), posterior-sector (PASA), acetabular anteversion (AcAV), and acetabular-index (AI). The method was validated against repeated manual measurements by three raters on a dataset of 18 patients (36 hips).ResultsNo differences between raters and the automatic method for the center (<i>P</i> = 0.18), anterior (<i>P</i> = 0.55), posterior (<i>P</i> = 0.18), lateral (<i>P</i> = 0.13), and medial (<i>P</i> = 0.12) landmarks. No statistically significant differences were observed between raters and the automatic method for the AASA (<i>P</i> = 0.01) and PASA (<i>P</i> = 0.08) angles. Statistically significant differences were found between the automatic method and rater 3 for the CE and AI angles, and between the automatic method and rater 2 for the AcAV angle. The ICC for all angle measurements by raters and the automated method was in the range of 0.90-0.99.ConclusionWith similar agreement between manual and automatic measurements, the automatic method provides important information that may be used for both diagnosis and surgical planning, with the potential to greatly reduce the time used for analysis per patient.

Acta RadiologicaVol. 66(11)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Aarhus University (DK), Erasmus MC (NL), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Aarhus Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Hip disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.