The Role of Hang‐Out Ties in Reading Comprehension and Small Group Interactions for Multilingual Students

ABSTRACT Small groups are commonly used in elementary reading classrooms, but relatively little research has examined the social factors that support small group reading instruction. This study tests whether the number of hang‐out ties (i.e., the number of ties between students who like to hang out together) in small groups predicts reading comprehension among multilingual children in Grades 4 and 5, and whether interactions differ in small groups with high and low numbers of hang‐out ties. We leverage data from a randomized controlled trial to examine whether the number of group hang‐out ties predicts the later reading comprehension scores of participating multilingual students ( N = 143; 46% female; 57% Asian American) using autoregressive path analysis. Furthermore, we explore differences in the patterns of interaction for groups with low (e.g., 0 to 2 ties) and high (e.g., 3 to 6) numbers of hang‐out ties to see whether these differences might help explain the predictiveness of group hang‐out ties on reading comprehension. Results indicated that the number of group hang‐out ties negatively predicted later reading comprehension. Exploratory analyses of interaction patterns using observation data revealed that teachers asked more open‐ended questions and elicited more student responses in groups with low numbers of hang‐out ties. These findings suggest that small‐group instruction may be most effective when students can learn from peers they know less well, as these other peers may offer novel linguistic assets, and that teachers may foster more group discussion when peers do not have existing hang‐out ties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reading Research Quarterly
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.70053
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Hang‐Out Ties in Reading Comprehension and Small Group Interactions for Multilingual Students

Michael J. Kieffer, Xiaoying Wu, S. Austin Cavanaugh, Andrew Weaver et al.
Reading Research Quarterly
Reading and Literacy Development
article

The Role of Hang‐Out Ties in Reading Comprehension and Small Group Interactions for Multilingual Students

Michael J. Kieffer, Xiaoying Wu, S. Austin Cavanaugh, Andrew Weaver, C. Patrick Proctor, Elise Cappella, Sasha Karbachinskiy
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Small groups are commonly used in elementary reading classrooms, but relatively little research has examined the social factors that support small group reading instruction. This study tests whether the number of hang‐out ties (i.e., the number of ties between students who like to hang out together) in small groups predicts reading comprehension among multilingual children in Grades 4 and 5, and whether interactions differ in small groups with high and low numbers of hang‐out ties. We leverage data from a randomized controlled trial to examine whether the number of group hang‐out ties predicts the later reading comprehension scores of participating multilingual students ( N = 143; 46% female; 57% Asian American) using autoregressive path analysis. Furthermore, we explore differences in the patterns of interaction for groups with low (e.g., 0 to 2 ties) and high (e.g., 3 to 6) numbers of hang‐out ties to see whether these differences might help explain the predictiveness of group hang‐out ties on reading comprehension. Results indicated that the number of group hang‐out ties negatively predicted later reading comprehension. Exploratory analyses of interaction patterns using observation data revealed that teachers asked more open‐ended questions and elicited more student responses in groups with low numbers of hang‐out ties. These findings suggest that small‐group instruction may be most effective when students can learn from peers they know less well, as these other peers may offer novel linguistic assets, and that teachers may foster more group discussion when peers do not have existing hang‐out ties.

Reading Research QuarterlyVol. 60(4)
Boston College (US), New York University (US), Marist University (US)
Institute of Education Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.