Assessing the evolution of zombie firm dynamics in the EU during COVID-19: a novel identification method and comparative analysis

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the increase in the number of zombie firms in the manufacturing sector was more pronounced in countries with significant credit easing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic and examines how the annual survival rates of firms identified as zombies over a two-year period evolved between 2016 and 2022. Design/methodology/approach To address this question, the authors classified EU27 countries based on four national-level pandemic policy indicators. The authors then identified zombie firms using four methods and analysed changes in their prevalence with descriptive statistics and a cohort matrix approach. The analysis draws on firm-level manufacturing data from five countries (2015–2022) sourced from the ORBIS database. Findings The authors found that in most supportive countries, the share of zombie firms rose in 2020 and fell in 2022 after subsidies ended, while in less supportive countries, it stagnated or declined in 2020. Research limitations/implications One of the main limitations of the research is that it relies on annual data for unlisted companies, which limits the ability to capture inter-annual fluctuations. Future research could explore additional firm-specific characteristics, such as working capital management and cash burn rates, and assess how these factors vary across countries with differing policy responses. Practical implications The findings show that while pandemic-era credit support temporarily increased zombie firm prevalence, the effect was not persistent. This implies that eligibility criteria and the sector’s recovery may have limited long-term zombification, which is an important feedback for policymakers. The authors applied a new method using EBITDA to identify zombie firms providing a practical tool in academic research and in credit risk assessment as an early-warning system. The findings may also be relevant for supervisory authorities responsible for financial stability, in line with concerns raised by recent ECB studies on corporate zombification risks. Originality/value This research contributes to the existing body of knowledge by offering a new definition and measuring method of zombie firms and introducing a unique clustering methodology for analysing policy impacts across multiple nations. The implications of the study are significant, suggesting that while credit support measures during the pandemic provided necessary relief for some firms, they also inadvertently fostered economic inefficiencies by sustaining non-viable firms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Economics and Finance
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sef-04-2024-0237
Primary Topic
Firm Innovation and Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the evolution of zombie firm dynamics in the EU during COVID-19: a novel identification method and comparative analysis

Béla Kádár, Jáki Erika
Studies in Economics and Finance
Firm Innovation and Growth
article

Assessing the evolution of zombie firm dynamics in the EU during COVID-19: a novel identification method and comparative analysis

Béla Kádár, Jáki Erika
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the increase in the number of zombie firms in the manufacturing sector was more pronounced in countries with significant credit easing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic and examines how the annual survival rates of firms identified as zombies over a two-year period evolved between 2016 and 2022. Design/methodology/approach To address this question, the authors classified EU27 countries based on four national-level pandemic policy indicators. The authors then identified zombie firms using four methods and analysed changes in their prevalence with descriptive statistics and a cohort matrix approach. The analysis draws on firm-level manufacturing data from five countries (2015–2022) sourced from the ORBIS database. Findings The authors found that in most supportive countries, the share of zombie firms rose in 2020 and fell in 2022 after subsidies ended, while in less supportive countries, it stagnated or declined in 2020. Research limitations/implications One of the main limitations of the research is that it relies on annual data for unlisted companies, which limits the ability to capture inter-annual fluctuations. Future research could explore additional firm-specific characteristics, such as working capital management and cash burn rates, and assess how these factors vary across countries with differing policy responses. Practical implications The findings show that while pandemic-era credit support temporarily increased zombie firm prevalence, the effect was not persistent. This implies that eligibility criteria and the sector’s recovery may have limited long-term zombification, which is an important feedback for policymakers. The authors applied a new method using EBITDA to identify zombie firms providing a practical tool in academic research and in credit risk assessment as an early-warning system. The findings may also be relevant for supervisory authorities responsible for financial stability, in line with concerns raised by recent ECB studies on corporate zombification risks. Originality/value This research contributes to the existing body of knowledge by offering a new definition and measuring method of zombie firms and introducing a unique clustering methodology for analysing policy impacts across multiple nations. The implications of the study are significant, suggesting that while credit support measures during the pandemic provided necessary relief for some firms, they also inadvertently fostered economic inefficiencies by sustaining non-viable firms.

Studies in Economics and FinanceVol. 42(5)
Budapest University of Economics and Business (HU), Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Firm Innovation and Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.