Restoring our tomorrow: planning for who we are

This article critically engages with the intersections of Indigeneity, decoloniality, and environmental disruption through a critique of the imposition of Bilagáanaa (Western) planning paradigms on the Navajo Nation governmental structures. We examine the Navajo Nation Chapter House Community Land Use Plan and emphasize how community-based processes of knowledge production, like mind maps, challenge and reframe the Navajo Nation Land policies. Historically, architectural and planning consultants produced comprehensive plans that are neither culturally suited to the desires of Diné (Navajo Nation citizens). These externally imposed processes often disregard the distinctive social dynamics, built environments, and community-based economies of Diné life, while simultaneously failing to articulate a sustainable, long-term vision for environmental and economic resilience. In response, we highlight how Diné apply the principles of Sa’ah Naagháí Bik’eh Hózhóón’ (critical Diné Land-based planning praxis).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AlterNative An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801251363133
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Restoring our tomorrow: planning for who we are

Michaela Paulette Shirley, Elisha Virginia Charley, Nihok’aa Diyin Dine’é Bikéyah
1 citations
AlterNative An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
8.52
article

Restoring our tomorrow: planning for who we are

Michaela Paulette Shirley, Elisha Virginia Charley, Nihok’aa Diyin Dine’é Bikéyah
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article critically engages with the intersections of Indigeneity, decoloniality, and environmental disruption through a critique of the imposition of Bilagáanaa (Western) planning paradigms on the Navajo Nation governmental structures. We examine the Navajo Nation Chapter House Community Land Use Plan and emphasize how community-based processes of knowledge production, like mind maps, challenge and reframe the Navajo Nation Land policies. Historically, architectural and planning consultants produced comprehensive plans that are neither culturally suited to the desires of Diné (Navajo Nation citizens). These externally imposed processes often disregard the distinctive social dynamics, built environments, and community-based economies of Diné life, while simultaneously failing to articulate a sustainable, long-term vision for environmental and economic resilience. In response, we highlight how Diné apply the principles of Sa’ah Naagháí Bik’eh Hózhóón’ (critical Diné Land-based planning praxis).

AlterNative An International Journal of Indigenous PeoplesVol. 21(3)
School for Advanced Research (US), Geographical Institute (HU), Metropolitan University (BD), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Restoring our tomorrow: planning for who we are — Michaela Paulette Shirley, Elisha Virginia Charley, et al. · AlterNative An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS