The Impact of Process-Product Approach on EFL Students’ Critical Thinking in Academic Report Writing

Critical thinking is a fundamental skill in academic writing, yet EFL instruction often focuses more on the final product than the cognitive process. This quasi-experimental study examined the effectiveness of the process-product approach in fostering critical thinking in academic report writing among EFL students. One hundred eleven sixth-semester English Education students at Saifuddin Zuhri State Islamic University were involved. Using cluster random sampling, two intact classes were selected: Class C (n = 40) as the experimental group and Class A (n = 40) as the control group. The experimental group received writing instruction based on the process-product approach, while the control group received conventional instruction. Critical thinking and report writing skills were assessed through pre- and post-tests, and the data were analyzed using paired-samples and independent-samples t-tests. The experimental group showed a significant improvement in critical thinking scores (pre-test M = 69.4, SD = 4.6; post-test M = 83.2, SD = 3.8), compared to the control group (pre-test M = 68.9, SD = 4.3; post-test M = 74.5, SD = 4.1), t(78) = 8.21, p < .001. Report writing scores also improved significantly in the experimental group (M = 85.0, SD = 3.7) versus the control group (M = 76.2, SD = 4.0), t(78) = 10.27, p < .001. The most notable gains were inference, evaluation, organization, and argument clarity. These findings support using the process-product approach to enhance critical thinking and writing skills in EFL academic contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGA Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21460/saga.2025.62.251
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Process-Product Approach on EFL Students’ Critical Thinking in Academic Report Writing

Benny Krisbiantoro
SAGA Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

The Impact of Process-Product Approach on EFL Students’ Critical Thinking in Academic Report Writing

Benny Krisbiantoro
article en

Abstract

Critical thinking is a fundamental skill in academic writing, yet EFL instruction often focuses more on the final product than the cognitive process. This quasi-experimental study examined the effectiveness of the process-product approach in fostering critical thinking in academic report writing among EFL students. One hundred eleven sixth-semester English Education students at Saifuddin Zuhri State Islamic University were involved. Using cluster random sampling, two intact classes were selected: Class C (n = 40) as the experimental group and Class A (n = 40) as the control group. The experimental group received writing instruction based on the process-product approach, while the control group received conventional instruction. Critical thinking and report writing skills were assessed through pre- and post-tests, and the data were analyzed using paired-samples and independent-samples t-tests. The experimental group showed a significant improvement in critical thinking scores (pre-test M = 69.4, SD = 4.6; post-test M = 83.2, SD = 3.8), compared to the control group (pre-test M = 68.9, SD = 4.3; post-test M = 74.5, SD = 4.1), t(78) = 8.21, p < .001. Report writing scores also improved significantly in the experimental group (M = 85.0, SD = 3.7) versus the control group (M = 76.2, SD = 4.0), t(78) = 10.27, p < .001. The most notable gains were inference, evaluation, organization, and argument clarity. These findings support using the process-product approach to enhance critical thinking and writing skills in EFL academic contexts.

SAGA Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied LinguisticsVol. 6(2)
Harapan Bangsa Institute of Technology (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.