Challenging the mainstream in times of crisis: evidence from legislative speeches in Italy (2013–2018)

This article examines whether and how the Eurosceptic stance of the populist Five Star Movement (M5S) has evolved since the party entered the Italian parliament and whether it has influenced the positions of mainstream parties. We combine the spatial approach to party competition with a quantitative text analysis of legislative speeches to analyse the EU domain of the Italian policy space during the 17th legislature (2013–2018). Our results suggest that this domain consists of two main dimensions: an economic dimension and an immigration dimension. The estimates of parties’ position shifts along these dimensions support the moderation hypothesis of challenger parties but not the contagion effect on mainstream parties. Overall, our findings contribute to both the literature on the complexity of policy domains such as the EU and the literature on legislative speeches as a tool for capturing the dynamics of party competition between elections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contemporary European Studies
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2025.2544023
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenging the mainstream in times of crisis: evidence from legislative speeches in Italy (2013–2018)

Luca Pinto, Karen Umansky, Daniela Giannetti
Journal of Contemporary European Studies
Media Influence and Politics
article

Challenging the mainstream in times of crisis: evidence from legislative speeches in Italy (2013–2018)

Luca Pinto, Karen Umansky, Daniela Giannetti
article en

Abstract

This article examines whether and how the Eurosceptic stance of the populist Five Star Movement (M5S) has evolved since the party entered the Italian parliament and whether it has influenced the positions of mainstream parties. We combine the spatial approach to party competition with a quantitative text analysis of legislative speeches to analyse the EU domain of the Italian policy space during the 17th legislature (2013–2018). Our results suggest that this domain consists of two main dimensions: an economic dimension and an immigration dimension. The estimates of parties’ position shifts along these dimensions support the moderation hypothesis of challenger parties but not the contagion effect on mainstream parties. Overall, our findings contribute to both the literature on the complexity of policy domains such as the EU and the literature on legislative speeches as a tool for capturing the dynamics of party competition between elections.

Journal of Contemporary European StudiesVol. 34(1)
University of Potsdam (DE), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Media Influence and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Challenging the mainstream in times of crisis: evidence from legislative speeches in Italy (2013–2018) — Luca Pinto, Karen Umansky, et al. · Journal of Contemporary European Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS