Global Governance of Cross-border Data Flows and China's Response

In the digital trade era, cross-border data flows have comprehensively reshaped international trade in terms of trade costs, trade volumes, trade structure, and trade efficiency. Control over data has become a key factor in competition among major powers. The United States, and the European Union have all developed regulatory templates for cross-border data flows, which exhibit significant heterogeneity. China's governance of cross-border data flows started relatively late, and there are differences in governance philosophy compared to the United States and Europe. Additionally, China needs to expand its "circle of friends" in cross-border data flows, improve its domestic data cross-border flow system, and optimize its overall development environment. This paper proposes that China should participate in the global governance of cross-border data flows based on the principles of reciprocity, inclusive development, multi-dimensional governance, and respect for national security and social public interests. Finally, the paper suggests that China should objectively recognize the differences between its rules and those of the United States and Europe. At the international level, China should expand its cross-border data flow network through various binding and non-binding platforms. At the domestic level, China should explore system innovations in cross-border data flows in free trade zones and continuously optimize the digital business environment in terms of digital infrastructure, cyber security, and supporting services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Economics
Published
2025-06-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58567/jie03020001
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Governance of Cross-border Data Flows and China's Response

Jiang Gao
Journal of Information Economics
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

Global Governance of Cross-border Data Flows and China's Response

Jiang Gao
article en

Abstract

In the digital trade era, cross-border data flows have comprehensively reshaped international trade in terms of trade costs, trade volumes, trade structure, and trade efficiency. Control over data has become a key factor in competition among major powers. The United States, and the European Union have all developed regulatory templates for cross-border data flows, which exhibit significant heterogeneity. China's governance of cross-border data flows started relatively late, and there are differences in governance philosophy compared to the United States and Europe. Additionally, China needs to expand its "circle of friends" in cross-border data flows, improve its domestic data cross-border flow system, and optimize its overall development environment. This paper proposes that China should participate in the global governance of cross-border data flows based on the principles of reciprocity, inclusive development, multi-dimensional governance, and respect for national security and social public interests. Finally, the paper suggests that China should objectively recognize the differences between its rules and those of the United States and Europe. At the international level, China should expand its cross-border data flow network through various binding and non-binding platforms. At the domestic level, China should explore system innovations in cross-border data flows in free trade zones and continuously optimize the digital business environment in terms of digital infrastructure, cyber security, and supporting services.

Journal of Information EconomicsVol. 3(2)
Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences (CN)
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Global Governance of Cross-border Data Flows and China's Response — Jiang Gao · Journal of Information Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS