How does the productivity of rugby league academies relate to differences in their physical qualities and physical development?

Different talent development (TDE) environments exhibit varying training practices in the rugby league talent identity and development systems (TIDS), which may influence rates of talent development and subsequent productivity of each TDE. This study aimed to compare physical qualities and rates of physical development between different rugby league TDEs within the same TIDS, alongside differences between groups of TDEs based on their level of productivity. A sample of 261 youth rugby league players from six academy teams (i.e., TDEs) within the professional TIDS were tested as part of a league-wide fitness testing battery for measures of anthropometrics, strength, power, speed, and cardiovascular fitness. Linear mixed models revealed medium, significant differences in maximum sprint velocity at the beginning of the season (η 2 = 0.05, p = 0.03) and large, significant differences in the development of prone Yo-Yo IR1 distance over time (η 2 = 0.14–0.18, p < 0.001) between TDEs. No significant differences between groups of TDEs based on their productivity were found. These findings indicate that possible variability in the practices of TDEs mostly leads to small or trivial differences in physical qualities and physical development. Differences in physical qualities and physical development do not appear to relate to the productivity of TDEs, therefore TDEs should focus on holistic development to maximise productivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541251367299
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How does the productivity of rugby league academies relate to differences in their physical qualities and physical development?

Kevin Till, John Alder, Sean Scantlebury, Cameron Owen et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
article

How does the productivity of rugby league academies relate to differences in their physical qualities and physical development?

Kevin Till, John Alder, Sean Scantlebury, Cameron Owen, Paul Anderson, Ben Jones, Sam Wild
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Different talent development (TDE) environments exhibit varying training practices in the rugby league talent identity and development systems (TIDS), which may influence rates of talent development and subsequent productivity of each TDE. This study aimed to compare physical qualities and rates of physical development between different rugby league TDEs within the same TIDS, alongside differences between groups of TDEs based on their level of productivity. A sample of 261 youth rugby league players from six academy teams (i.e., TDEs) within the professional TIDS were tested as part of a league-wide fitness testing battery for measures of anthropometrics, strength, power, speed, and cardiovascular fitness. Linear mixed models revealed medium, significant differences in maximum sprint velocity at the beginning of the season (η 2 = 0.05, p = 0.03) and large, significant differences in the development of prone Yo-Yo IR1 distance over time (η 2 = 0.14–0.18, p < 0.001) between TDEs. No significant differences between groups of TDEs based on their productivity were found. These findings indicate that possible variability in the practices of TDEs mostly leads to small or trivial differences in physical qualities and physical development. Differences in physical qualities and physical development do not appear to relate to the productivity of TDEs, therefore TDEs should focus on holistic development to maximise productivity.

International Journal of Sports Science & CoachingVol. 21(1)
University of Cape Town (ZA), The Football Association (GB), World Rugby (IE), Leeds Beckett University (GB), Australian Catholic University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.