Optimizing Task Allocation in Human-in-the-Lead Construction Robotics: A Framework for Wood Assembly–Based Robotics in Panelized Construction

Existing human–robot collaboration (HRC) research often overemphasizes an equal partnership, which can hinder the effective integration of robots in the dynamic environment of industrialized construction (IC). This paper introduces a Human-in-the-Lead Construction Robotics (HiLCR) framework that prioritizes human leadership. By leveraging humans’ ability to handle IC complexities, including customized designs and material variability, HiLCR optimizes task allocation. The proposed two-level framework utilizes design- and task-driven parametric and tolerance analysis. This framework divides tasks into three categories by conducting a parametric analysis (first level) to link design parameters with prefabrication tasks, and a tolerance analysis (second level) using Monte Carlo simulations accounts for material variability, particularly in natural wood assemblies. The results of the tolerance analysis further subdivide tasks into automated and guided standard procedures. The task allocation of 96 standardized IC activities resulted in 65 repetitive procedures automated for robots and 31 guided and dynamic procedures assigned to human workers. Human procedures encompassed all tasks requiring decision-making for fine-tuning assembly, whereas robot procedures included physically demanding (e.g., pick-up) and hazardous operations (e.g., nailing and cutting).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Published
2025-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jccee5.cpeng-6570
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Task Allocation in Human-in-the-Lead Construction Robotics: A Framework for Wood Assembly–Based Robotics in Panelized Construction

Aladdin Alwisy, Behnam M. Tehrani
2 citations
Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
2.01
article

Optimizing Task Allocation in Human-in-the-Lead Construction Robotics: A Framework for Wood Assembly–Based Robotics in Panelized Construction

Aladdin Alwisy, Behnam M. Tehrani
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Existing human–robot collaboration (HRC) research often overemphasizes an equal partnership, which can hinder the effective integration of robots in the dynamic environment of industrialized construction (IC). This paper introduces a Human-in-the-Lead Construction Robotics (HiLCR) framework that prioritizes human leadership. By leveraging humans’ ability to handle IC complexities, including customized designs and material variability, HiLCR optimizes task allocation. The proposed two-level framework utilizes design- and task-driven parametric and tolerance analysis. This framework divides tasks into three categories by conducting a parametric analysis (first level) to link design parameters with prefabrication tasks, and a tolerance analysis (second level) using Monte Carlo simulations accounts for material variability, particularly in natural wood assemblies. The results of the tolerance analysis further subdivide tasks into automated and guided standard procedures. The task allocation of 96 standardized IC activities resulted in 65 repetitive procedures automated for robots and 31 guided and dynamic procedures assigned to human workers. Human procedures encompassed all tasks requiring decision-making for fine-tuning assembly, whereas robot procedures included physically demanding (e.g., pick-up) and hazardous operations (e.g., nailing and cutting).

Journal of Computing in Civil EngineeringVol. 39(6)
University of Florida (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.