The Nature and Dynamics of Access: Conceptualizing and Measuring Procedural Engagement Dynamics Between EU Interest Groups and Public Officials

ABSTRACT Policy engagement procedures now demand more from interest groups and require them to adopt more collaborative‐minded behaviors when interacting with policymakers. While existing scholarship largely conceptualizes policy engagement as policy access, commonly measured by frequency or type of engagement, studies examining the precise nature and dynamics of policy access remain rare. We examine how interest groups experience their engagement with policymakers, and whether this impacts their overall level of satisfaction in consultation processes. We unpack the nature of what this engagement entails by considering enabling and restricting procedural aspects covered by the collaborative governance literature to complement the focus on policy access by the interest group literature. Analyzing EU interest group survey data, we find engagement processes feature both enabling and restricting elements, and vary across group types. Furthermore, we clarify the relation between enabling features, and levels of satisfaction with the consultation process, as well as the role of political contestation and prior involvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Governance
Published
2025-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70048
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Nature and Dynamics of Access: Conceptualizing and Measuring Procedural Engagement Dynamics Between EU Interest Groups and Public Officials

Caelesta Braun, Erin A. Sullivan, Bert Fraussen
211 links
Governance
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
article

The Nature and Dynamics of Access: Conceptualizing and Measuring Procedural Engagement Dynamics Between EU Interest Groups and Public Officials

Caelesta Braun, Erin A. Sullivan, Bert Fraussen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Policy engagement procedures now demand more from interest groups and require them to adopt more collaborative‐minded behaviors when interacting with policymakers. While existing scholarship largely conceptualizes policy engagement as policy access, commonly measured by frequency or type of engagement, studies examining the precise nature and dynamics of policy access remain rare. We examine how interest groups experience their engagement with policymakers, and whether this impacts their overall level of satisfaction in consultation processes. We unpack the nature of what this engagement entails by considering enabling and restricting procedural aspects covered by the collaborative governance literature to complement the focus on policy access by the interest group literature. Analyzing EU interest group survey data, we find engagement processes feature both enabling and restricting elements, and vary across group types. Furthermore, we clarify the relation between enabling features, and levels of satisfaction with the consultation process, as well as the role of political contestation and prior involvement.

GovernanceVol. 38(4)
Leiden University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.