<b>Review of road selection</b> methods for the purpose of multiscale mapping

Abstract Cartographic generalization reduces map detail to ensure clarity and accuracy at smaller scales. This study reviews road selection methods for multiscale mapping, covering scales from 1:10,000 to 1:1,000,000. The applied methodology was inspired by the PRISMA search model and based on searches in the Web of Science and Scopus databases, supported by the ResearchRabbit platform. As a result, five categories of approaches: semantic-based, stroke-based, mesh-based, graph-based, and machine learning-based, were identified and analyzed in terms of their strengths and limitations. Emphasis was placed on automation and the importance of selecting appropriate generalization techniques based on map scale and purpose. The literature review also revealed a variety of quality evaluation metrics used in the analyzed approaches, with a predominance of quantitative measures such as accuracy and F1-score, complemented by qualitative expert visual assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Miscellanea Geographica
Published
2025-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2025-0031
Primary Topic
Geographic Information Systems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review of road selection methods for the purpose of multiscale mapping

Izabela Karsznia, Albert Adolf
Miscellanea Geographica
Geographic Information Systems Studies
article

Review of road selection methods for the purpose of multiscale mapping

Izabela Karsznia, Albert Adolf
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cartographic generalization reduces map detail to ensure clarity and accuracy at smaller scales. This study reviews road selection methods for multiscale mapping, covering scales from 1:10,000 to 1:1,000,000. The applied methodology was inspired by the PRISMA search model and based on searches in the Web of Science and Scopus databases, supported by the ResearchRabbit platform. As a result, five categories of approaches: semantic-based, stroke-based, mesh-based, graph-based, and machine learning-based, were identified and analyzed in terms of their strengths and limitations. Emphasis was placed on automation and the importance of selecting appropriate generalization techniques based on map scale and purpose. The literature review also revealed a variety of quality evaluation metrics used in the analyzed approaches, with a predominance of quantitative measures such as accuracy and F1-score, complemented by qualitative expert visual assessments.

Miscellanea GeographicaVol. 29(4)
University of Warsaw (PL)
Narodowym Centrum Nauki
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Geographic Information Systems Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

<b>Review of road selection</b> methods for the purpose of multiscale mapping — Izabela Karsznia, Albert Adolf · Miscellanea Geographica (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS