Weld Defect Detection in Laser Beam Welding Using Multispectral Emission Sensor Features and Machine Learning

Laser beam welding (LBW) involves complex and rapid interactions between the laser and material, often resulting in defects such as pore formation. Emissions collected during the process offer valuable insight but are difficult to interpret directly for defect detection. In this study, we propose a data-driven framework to interpret electromagnetic emissions in LBW using both supervised and unsupervised learning. Our framework is implemented in the post-process monitoring stage and can be used as a real-time framework. The supervised approach uses labeled data corresponding to predefined defects (in this work, pore formation is an example of a defined defect). Meanwhile, the unsupervised method is used to identify anomalies without using predefined labels. Supervised and unsupervised learning aims to find reference values in the emissions data to determine the values of signals that lead to defects in welding (enabling quantitative monitoring). A total of 81 welding experiments were conducted, recording real-time emission data across 42 spectral channels. From these signals, statistical, temporal, and shape-based features were extracted, and dimensionality was reduced using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The LSTM model achieved an average mean squared error (MSE) of 0.0029 and mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0288 on the testing set across five folds. The Isolation Forest achieved 80% accuracy and 85.7% precision in detecting anomalous welds on a subset with validated defect labels. The proposed framework enhances the interpretability of 4D photonic data and enables both post-process analysis and potential real-time monitoring. It provides a scalable, data-driven approach to weld quality assessment for industrial applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25165120
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weld Defect Detection in Laser Beam Welding Using Multispectral Emission Sensor Features and Machine Learning

Magnus Persson, Stefan Ericson, Rohollah Ghasemi, Kent Salomonsson et al.
2 citations
Sensors
Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
1.43
article

Weld Defect Detection in Laser Beam Welding Using Multispectral Emission Sensor Features and Machine Learning

Magnus Persson, Stefan Ericson, Rohollah Ghasemi, Kent Salomonsson, Amena Darwish
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Laser beam welding (LBW) involves complex and rapid interactions between the laser and material, often resulting in defects such as pore formation. Emissions collected during the process offer valuable insight but are difficult to interpret directly for defect detection. In this study, we propose a data-driven framework to interpret electromagnetic emissions in LBW using both supervised and unsupervised learning. Our framework is implemented in the post-process monitoring stage and can be used as a real-time framework. The supervised approach uses labeled data corresponding to predefined defects (in this work, pore formation is an example of a defined defect). Meanwhile, the unsupervised method is used to identify anomalies without using predefined labels. Supervised and unsupervised learning aims to find reference values in the emissions data to determine the values of signals that lead to defects in welding (enabling quantitative monitoring). A total of 81 welding experiments were conducted, recording real-time emission data across 42 spectral channels. From these signals, statistical, temporal, and shape-based features were extracted, and dimensionality was reduced using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The LSTM model achieved an average mean squared error (MSE) of 0.0029 and mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0288 on the testing set across five folds. The Isolation Forest achieved 80% accuracy and 85.7% precision in detecting anomalous welds on a subset with validated defect labels. The proposed framework enhances the interpretability of 4D photonic data and enables both post-process analysis and potential real-time monitoring. It provides a scalable, data-driven approach to weld quality assessment for industrial applications.

SensorsVol. 25(16)
University of Skövde (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.