Merit thrives under evidence-based DEI practices and disparate impact protections

Abstract Meritocracy is a central ideal in American workforce management, yet systemic biases and structural barriers often undermine its implementation. Executive orders (EO) 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity, and 14281, Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy, aim to reinforce meritocratic principles by eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and disparate impact protections. However, these orders operate under the flawed assumption that a meritocracy will naturally emerge without intervention, disregarding evidence that superfluous factors outside merit impact organizational decisions. This policy brief argues that evidence-based DEI practices and disparate impact protections are not antithetical to meritocracy but are, in fact, necessary for its achievement. We discuss the implications of these EOs, focusing on how they may harm employee and organizational functioning and undermine the very principles they seek to uphold. Finally, we propose actions I-O psychologists can take, including issuing unified definitions of key terms, setting standards of practice for improving merit-based decision making, publicizing the broad utility of DEI initiatives and disparate impact protections, and advancing related research. These recommendations offer a path to uphold fairness and excellence in workforce management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2025.10021
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Merit thrives under evidence-based DEI practices and disparate impact protections

Lindsay Y. Dhanani, Christopher W. Wiese, Spencer C. Garcia
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
article

Merit thrives under evidence-based DEI practices and disparate impact protections

Lindsay Y. Dhanani, Christopher W. Wiese, Spencer C. Garcia
article en

Abstract

Abstract Meritocracy is a central ideal in American workforce management, yet systemic biases and structural barriers often undermine its implementation. Executive orders (EO) 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity, and 14281, Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy, aim to reinforce meritocratic principles by eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and disparate impact protections. However, these orders operate under the flawed assumption that a meritocracy will naturally emerge without intervention, disregarding evidence that superfluous factors outside merit impact organizational decisions. This policy brief argues that evidence-based DEI practices and disparate impact protections are not antithetical to meritocracy but are, in fact, necessary for its achievement. We discuss the implications of these EOs, focusing on how they may harm employee and organizational functioning and undermine the very principles they seek to uphold. Finally, we propose actions I-O psychologists can take, including issuing unified definitions of key terms, setting standards of practice for improving merit-based decision making, publicizing the broad utility of DEI initiatives and disparate impact protections, and advancing related research. These recommendations offer a path to uphold fairness and excellence in workforce management.

Industrial and Organizational PsychologyVol. 18(3)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.