Uncertainty assessment for generalized linear models via local bootstrapping

Variable selection has been commonly conducted to identify a subset of predictors that significantly contribute to outcomes. Besides obtaining sparse estimates, evaluating estimation uncertainty for parameters is also pivotal. This assessment can be achieved via high-dimensional inference, involving the construction of confidence intervals or hypothesis testing. Different from estimation uncertainty, which reflects the variability in parameter estimates, selection uncertainty reflects the variability in the selection of predictors, including size and composition. Both types of uncertainty can inform the reliability of variable selection procedures. In this paper, we use generalized linear models to either approximate or specify the true data generating process. First, a local residual bootstrap (LRB) is introduced to approximate the distribution of high-dimensional penalized estimates encompassing all values of the regression parameter vector. The simultaneous confidence regions by the LRB can provide insights into estimation uncertainty. Second, by using the LRB, the model confidence bound (MCB) is constructed to evaluate selection uncertainty. Rigorous proofs establish the consistency properties of the LRB and coverage properties of the MCB. To promote implementation, the modified local residual bootstrap (mLRB) is proposed, and two visualization curves are introduced to facilitate the assessment and comparison of selection uncertainty. Simulations demonstrate the proposed approaches' practical utility and superiority over closely related alternatives. In the analysis of two real data sets, the proposed analysis provides valuable insights into the uncertainty of the selection results.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientia Sinica Mathematica
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1360/scm-2023-0780
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty assessment for generalized linear models via local bootstrapping

Yang Li, Rong Li, Qin Yichen, Ma Shuangge
Scientia Sinica Mathematica
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

Uncertainty assessment for generalized linear models via local bootstrapping

Yang Li, Rong Li, Qin Yichen, Ma Shuangge
article en

Abstract

Variable selection has been commonly conducted to identify a subset of predictors that significantly contribute to outcomes. Besides obtaining sparse estimates, evaluating estimation uncertainty for parameters is also pivotal. This assessment can be achieved via high-dimensional inference, involving the construction of confidence intervals or hypothesis testing. Different from estimation uncertainty, which reflects the variability in parameter estimates, selection uncertainty reflects the variability in the selection of predictors, including size and composition. Both types of uncertainty can inform the reliability of variable selection procedures. In this paper, we use generalized linear models to either approximate or specify the true data generating process. First, a local residual bootstrap (LRB) is introduced to approximate the distribution of high-dimensional penalized estimates encompassing all values of the regression parameter vector. The simultaneous confidence regions by the LRB can provide insights into estimation uncertainty. Second, by using the LRB, the model confidence bound (MCB) is constructed to evaluate selection uncertainty. Rigorous proofs establish the consistency properties of the LRB and coverage properties of the MCB. To promote implementation, the modified local residual bootstrap (mLRB) is proposed, and two visualization curves are introduced to facilitate the assessment and comparison of selection uncertainty. Simulations demonstrate the proposed approaches' practical utility and superiority over closely related alternatives. In the analysis of two real data sets, the proposed analysis provides valuable insights into the uncertainty of the selection results.

Scientia Sinica Mathematica
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.