Analysis of adoption of genetic tools in the northern Australia beef industry

Context Genetic improvement of beef production systems has become a priority for beef cattle producers in northern Australia. However, reports from across Australia indicate that 76% and 59% of commercial and stud cattle beef cattle producers, respectively, use genetic evaluation services, which is considerably higher than the current levels of northern Australian beef producers. Aims This study aims to identify the demographic and productive variables that influence decision-making regarding the use of genetic tools, and identify the motivations, limitations and preferences of northern Australia beef cattle producers. Methods An online survey was completed by 97 beef producers in northern Australia. Participants were classified into seedstock and commercial beef cattle producers. The data were analysed with logistic regression and nonparametric tests. Key results The results demonstrate that for seedstock beef cattle producers, each additional year of age increased the likelihood of adopting genetic tools by 6.4%. In contrast, for commercial beef cattle producers, each additional year of age decreased the likelihood by 5.2%. However, commercial beef cattle producers who collect phenotypic data are more likely to adopt genetic tools. Beef cattle producers preferred records of fertility and growth traits of beef cattle. Furthermore, recording data at the birth of beef cattle in northern Australia emerges as a barrier to the adoption of genetic tools. A key motivation for adoption is understanding genetic tools and their impact on the business. Conclusions Understanding genetic tools and their impact on beef enterprises is critical to motivating their adoption by beef cattle producers. Demographic, production and profitability factors associated with their use affect the likelihood of adoption of genetic tools in the northern Australian beef industry. Implications An understanding of genetic tools, the impact on the economic benefits of beef cattle enterprises by producers and the reasons for change in complex decision-making related to animal genetic improvement are fundamental in the process of developing extension strategies. Future research is needed to understand the training demands and delivery methods under northern Australian conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Production Science
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/an25090
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of adoption of genetic tools in the northern Australia beef industry

Amy Cosby, Jaime Manning, Patricia Menchon, Dave L. Swain
Animal Production Science
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
article

Analysis of adoption of genetic tools in the northern Australia beef industry

Amy Cosby, Jaime Manning, Patricia Menchon, Dave L. Swain
article en

Abstract

Context Genetic improvement of beef production systems has become a priority for beef cattle producers in northern Australia. However, reports from across Australia indicate that 76% and 59% of commercial and stud cattle beef cattle producers, respectively, use genetic evaluation services, which is considerably higher than the current levels of northern Australian beef producers. Aims This study aims to identify the demographic and productive variables that influence decision-making regarding the use of genetic tools, and identify the motivations, limitations and preferences of northern Australia beef cattle producers. Methods An online survey was completed by 97 beef producers in northern Australia. Participants were classified into seedstock and commercial beef cattle producers. The data were analysed with logistic regression and nonparametric tests. Key results The results demonstrate that for seedstock beef cattle producers, each additional year of age increased the likelihood of adopting genetic tools by 6.4%. In contrast, for commercial beef cattle producers, each additional year of age decreased the likelihood by 5.2%. However, commercial beef cattle producers who collect phenotypic data are more likely to adopt genetic tools. Beef cattle producers preferred records of fertility and growth traits of beef cattle. Furthermore, recording data at the birth of beef cattle in northern Australia emerges as a barrier to the adoption of genetic tools. A key motivation for adoption is understanding genetic tools and their impact on the business. Conclusions Understanding genetic tools and their impact on beef enterprises is critical to motivating their adoption by beef cattle producers. Demographic, production and profitability factors associated with their use affect the likelihood of adoption of genetic tools in the northern Australian beef industry. Implications An understanding of genetic tools, the impact on the economic benefits of beef cattle enterprises by producers and the reasons for change in complex decision-making related to animal genetic improvement are fundamental in the process of developing extension strategies. Future research is needed to understand the training demands and delivery methods under northern Australian conditions.

Animal Production ScienceVol. 65(12)
National Australia Bank (AU), Central Queensland University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.