Including the tech, keeping the human: Integrating generative AI in the feedback writing process

This paper explores the integration of generative AI in the writing feedback process by trialling two highly scaffolded feedback tasks. This paper draws on recent literature to consider both the significant benefits AI integration may afford the language learner, as well as negative effects. Two tasks trialled at UNSW College: (1) an AI-enhanced layered feedback process; and (2) a sentence-editing task, are outlined. These tasks were designed with the goal of incorporating generative AI in the editing stage of the writing process, in an effective and ethical manner, with an emphasis on building feedback literacy and maintaining cognitive engagement and language development. The paper explains how these tasks were designed to mitigate the negative effects that generative AI integration may also have on the language learner, particularly over-reliance and negative impacts on individual writer's voice and critical thinking skills. Observations from trialling these tasks at UNSW College are given, in consideration of the potential benefits provided to the ELICOS student. The paper considers how maintaining a student-centred approach to technological integration can help develop crucial digital literacy skills in an increasingly digital and AI- driven world.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
English Australia Journal
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61504/gxaf4503
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Including the tech, keeping the human: Integrating generative AI in the feedback writing process

Ryan M. Phelan
English Australia Journal
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
article

Including the tech, keeping the human: Integrating generative AI in the feedback writing process

Ryan M. Phelan
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the integration of generative AI in the writing feedback process by trialling two highly scaffolded feedback tasks. This paper draws on recent literature to consider both the significant benefits AI integration may afford the language learner, as well as negative effects. Two tasks trialled at UNSW College: (1) an AI-enhanced layered feedback process; and (2) a sentence-editing task, are outlined. These tasks were designed with the goal of incorporating generative AI in the editing stage of the writing process, in an effective and ethical manner, with an emphasis on building feedback literacy and maintaining cognitive engagement and language development. The paper explains how these tasks were designed to mitigate the negative effects that generative AI integration may also have on the language learner, particularly over-reliance and negative impacts on individual writer's voice and critical thinking skills. Observations from trialling these tasks at UNSW College are given, in consideration of the potential benefits provided to the ELICOS student. The paper considers how maintaining a student-centred approach to technological integration can help develop crucial digital literacy skills in an increasingly digital and AI- driven world.

English Australia JournalVol. 41(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Including the tech, keeping the human: Integrating generative AI in the feedback writing process — Ryan M. Phelan · English Australia Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS