Comparison of GPU-accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulation Efficiency for the Acetylcholinesterase-Huprine X Complex using YASARA, GROMACS, and AMBER

Molecular dynamics simulations are a valuable tool in identifying potential acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease therapy. Recent advancements in hardware and software, particularly the implementation of graphics processing units (GPUs), have significantly improved the efficiency of MD simulations. This study aims to compare GPU-accelerated molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the acetylcholinesterase-Huprine X complex using YASARA, GROMACS, and AMBER. The complex was obtained from Protein Data bank with code 1E66 and was prepared with same conditions. MD simulations were performed for 50 ns with three replicates per software. GROMACS exhibited the shortest average simulation duration (45,104 seconds), followed by AMBER (48,884 seconds) and YASARA (649,208 seconds). RMSD analysis of protein backbone and ligand movement indicated stable simulations across all platforms. Interaction analysis at 25 ns and 35 ns of YASARA’s run revealed that Huprine X maintained key aromatic interactions within the AChE binding pocket, despite undergoing a 180° rotation. YASARA proved more efficient in MD preparation and produced more precise results, while GROMACS was most efficient in simulation runtime. The study highlights the trade-offs between ease of use, simulation speed, and result consistency among these software packages for AChE-HUX MD simulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Community
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24071/jpsc.009061
Primary Topic
Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of GPU-accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulation Efficiency for the Acetylcholinesterase-Huprine X Complex using YASARA, GROMACS, and AMBER

Enade Perdana Istyastono, Bonifacius Ivan Wiranata
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Community
Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
article

Comparison of GPU-accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulation Efficiency for the Acetylcholinesterase-Huprine X Complex using YASARA, GROMACS, and AMBER

Enade Perdana Istyastono, Bonifacius Ivan Wiranata
article en

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations are a valuable tool in identifying potential acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease therapy. Recent advancements in hardware and software, particularly the implementation of graphics processing units (GPUs), have significantly improved the efficiency of MD simulations. This study aims to compare GPU-accelerated molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the acetylcholinesterase-Huprine X complex using YASARA, GROMACS, and AMBER. The complex was obtained from Protein Data bank with code 1E66 and was prepared with same conditions. MD simulations were performed for 50 ns with three replicates per software. GROMACS exhibited the shortest average simulation duration (45,104 seconds), followed by AMBER (48,884 seconds) and YASARA (649,208 seconds). RMSD analysis of protein backbone and ligand movement indicated stable simulations across all platforms. Interaction analysis at 25 ns and 35 ns of YASARA’s run revealed that Huprine X maintained key aromatic interactions within the AChE binding pocket, despite undergoing a 180° rotation. YASARA proved more efficient in MD preparation and produced more precise results, while GROMACS was most efficient in simulation runtime. The study highlights the trade-offs between ease of use, simulation speed, and result consistency among these software packages for AChE-HUX MD simulations.

Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and CommunityVol. 22(1)
Sanata Dharma University (ID)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.