The importance of frequency–place mismatch in the quality of sound perceived in single-sided deafness among cochlear implant recipients

Introduction Single-sided deafness (SSD) affects the ability to localize sounds and understand speech in noisy environments, significantly impacting the quality of life. Cochlear implants (CIs) have been explored as a solution for SSD, with varying success attributed to different factors, such as onset of deafness (pre- vs. post-lingual), duration of especially pre-lingual deafness, and compliance to rehab protocols, as well as the frequency-to-place mismatch, where the frequency assigned to CI electrodes does not align with the cochlea's natural tonotopy. The objective is to investigate the influence of frequency-to-place mismatch on hearing performance, sound quality, and patient satisfaction in SSD CI recipients by comparing default and anatomical frequency mapping. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 19 SSD patients implanted with MEDEL CIs between 2014 and 2023. Post-activation, high-resolution cone beam computed tomography scans were analyzed using OTOPLAN ® (Version V4) to define anatomical frequency mapping. The average frequency mismatch (AFM) between default and anatomical mapping was calculated. Speech intelligibility was assessed using articulation function (AF) scores, and sound quality was evaluated through patient questionnaires. Results A significant negative correlation between AFM and AF ( R = −0.47, p = 0.042) was observed. Sound quality aspects, including natural sound perception and similarity to the normal ear, inversely correlated with AFM ( R 2 = 0.281, p = 0.05, and R 2 = 0.301, p = 0.043, respectively). Global satisfaction scores were high (3.58 ± 0.77), unaffected by AFM. Conclusion Frequency-to-place mismatch impacts speech intelligibility and sound quality in SSD CI patients. Anatomical frequency mapping using tools like OTOPLAN can enhance CI outcomes, highlighting the need for individualized cochlear measurements and electrode assignment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Audiology and Otology
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fauot.2025.1648716
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The importance of frequency–place mismatch in the quality of sound perceived in single-sided deafness among cochlear implant recipients

Nemanja Ivanovic, Guillaume Gersdorff, Philippe Lefèbvre, Séverine Camby et al.
Frontiers in Audiology and Otology
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

The importance of frequency–place mismatch in the quality of sound perceived in single-sided deafness among cochlear implant recipients

Nemanja Ivanovic, Guillaume Gersdorff, Philippe Lefèbvre, Séverine Camby, Peter Nopp, Masoud Zoka Assadi
article en

Abstract

Introduction Single-sided deafness (SSD) affects the ability to localize sounds and understand speech in noisy environments, significantly impacting the quality of life. Cochlear implants (CIs) have been explored as a solution for SSD, with varying success attributed to different factors, such as onset of deafness (pre- vs. post-lingual), duration of especially pre-lingual deafness, and compliance to rehab protocols, as well as the frequency-to-place mismatch, where the frequency assigned to CI electrodes does not align with the cochlea's natural tonotopy. The objective is to investigate the influence of frequency-to-place mismatch on hearing performance, sound quality, and patient satisfaction in SSD CI recipients by comparing default and anatomical frequency mapping. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 19 SSD patients implanted with MEDEL CIs between 2014 and 2023. Post-activation, high-resolution cone beam computed tomography scans were analyzed using OTOPLAN ® (Version V4) to define anatomical frequency mapping. The average frequency mismatch (AFM) between default and anatomical mapping was calculated. Speech intelligibility was assessed using articulation function (AF) scores, and sound quality was evaluated through patient questionnaires. Results A significant negative correlation between AFM and AF ( R = −0.47, p = 0.042) was observed. Sound quality aspects, including natural sound perception and similarity to the normal ear, inversely correlated with AFM ( R 2 = 0.281, p = 0.05, and R 2 = 0.301, p = 0.043, respectively). Global satisfaction scores were high (3.58 ± 0.77), unaffected by AFM. Conclusion Frequency-to-place mismatch impacts speech intelligibility and sound quality in SSD CI patients. Anatomical frequency mapping using tools like OTOPLAN can enhance CI outcomes, highlighting the need for individualized cochlear measurements and electrode assignment.

Frontiers in Audiology and OtologyVol. 3
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège (BE), MED-EL (Austria) (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.