Livelihoods, Crops and Coexistence: Understanding Farmers' Agronomical Decisions in High Elephant-Conflict Landscapes

Farmers in rural areas of Botswana depend on subsistence farming for their livelihoods.However, elephant crop-raiding is a challenge in the eastern Okavango area.To devise effective mitigation strategies, it is essential to understand farmers' rationale for crop choices, cropping methods, and perceptions about raiding.To this end, we surveyed 151 randomly selected farmers in 2018.We discovered that farmers relied on arable farming to sustain their livelihoods.The majority use a combination of their own seeds augmented with government seeds.About 95.4% of farmers suffered crop loss to elephants, yet only 35.8% indicated that elephants influence how they arrange crops during plantings.Food preference, crop importance to household and free seeds were leading determinants of the type of crop to grow, rather than vulnerability to elephant raiding.Despite knowing that elephants damage cereal and fruit crops more than legumes, most farmers still preferred to grow these crops since they are a primary component for household consumption.Nonetheless, farmers were willing to grow new crops (87.4%) and adopt new planting methods (84.10%) if it would reduce elephant raiding.However, they strongly believe that planting strategies cannot mitigate the problem.Ultimately, the study highlights that knowledge-sharing platforms to squash negative perceptions, affordability, farmers' preferences, and culture critically influence the farmers' considerations for adopting cropping attributes proposed to improve crop resilience and food security.Therefore, participatory inclusion of stakeholders is key to enhance mitigation acceptance, adoption and long-term sustenance.The resilience measures can improve attitudes towards elephants, minimise crop loss and facilitate coexistence with elephants in communities adjacent to protected areas.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Direct Research Journal of Agriculture and Food Science
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26765/drjafs58737551
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Livelihoods, Crops and Coexistence: Understanding Farmers' Agronomical Decisions in High Elephant-Conflict Landscapes

Amanda Stronza, Graham A. McCulloch, Anna Songhurst, Joseph Adjetey et al.
Direct Research Journal of Agriculture and Food Science
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
article

Livelihoods, Crops and Coexistence: Understanding Farmers' Agronomical Decisions in High Elephant-Conflict Landscapes

Amanda Stronza, Graham A. McCulloch, Anna Songhurst, Joseph Adjetey, Tiroyaone Albertinah Matsika
article en

Abstract

Farmers in rural areas of Botswana depend on subsistence farming for their livelihoods.However, elephant crop-raiding is a challenge in the eastern Okavango area.To devise effective mitigation strategies, it is essential to understand farmers' rationale for crop choices, cropping methods, and perceptions about raiding.To this end, we surveyed 151 randomly selected farmers in 2018.We discovered that farmers relied on arable farming to sustain their livelihoods.The majority use a combination of their own seeds augmented with government seeds.About 95.4% of farmers suffered crop loss to elephants, yet only 35.8% indicated that elephants influence how they arrange crops during plantings.Food preference, crop importance to household and free seeds were leading determinants of the type of crop to grow, rather than vulnerability to elephant raiding.Despite knowing that elephants damage cereal and fruit crops more than legumes, most farmers still preferred to grow these crops since they are a primary component for household consumption.Nonetheless, farmers were willing to grow new crops (87.4%) and adopt new planting methods (84.10%) if it would reduce elephant raiding.However, they strongly believe that planting strategies cannot mitigate the problem.Ultimately, the study highlights that knowledge-sharing platforms to squash negative perceptions, affordability, farmers' preferences, and culture critically influence the farmers' considerations for adopting cropping attributes proposed to improve crop resilience and food security.Therefore, participatory inclusion of stakeholders is key to enhance mitigation acceptance, adoption and long-term sustenance.The resilience measures can improve attitudes towards elephants, minimise crop loss and facilitate coexistence with elephants in communities adjacent to protected areas.

Direct Research Journal of Agriculture and Food ScienceVol. 13(3)
Ministry of Environment
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.