Abuse of Rights in Icelandic Property Law With a Comparative Survey of the Other Nordic Countries

This article examines whether abuse of rights constitutes a general legal doctrine in Icelandic law, focusing on its application in property law, through doctrinal analysis and a comparative survey of other Nordic legal systems. Property ownership grants individuals broad authority over their assets, but legal systems impose limits to prevent harmful uses. While Icelandic law recognizes the principle of nuisance, which restricts property use that harms or significantly inconveniences others, it remains unclear whether a general prohibition against abuse of rights exists. Unlike other Nordic countries, Iceland lacks recognition of the abuse of rights doctrine, yet related legal principles have been acknowledged. This article concludes that Icelandic law should recognize the abuse of rights doctrine to complement existing legal doctrines. It also suggests that public interest considerations, including environmental and sustainability concerns, could play a role in shaping an Icelandic abuse of rights doctrine.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2025052
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abuse of Rights in Icelandic Property Law With a Comparative Survey of the Other Nordic Countries

Víðir Smári Petersen
European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht
European and International Law Studies
article

Abuse of Rights in Icelandic Property Law With a Comparative Survey of the Other Nordic Countries

Víðir Smári Petersen
article en

Abstract

This article examines whether abuse of rights constitutes a general legal doctrine in Icelandic law, focusing on its application in property law, through doctrinal analysis and a comparative survey of other Nordic legal systems. Property ownership grants individuals broad authority over their assets, but legal systems impose limits to prevent harmful uses. While Icelandic law recognizes the principle of nuisance, which restricts property use that harms or significantly inconveniences others, it remains unclear whether a general prohibition against abuse of rights exists. Unlike other Nordic countries, Iceland lacks recognition of the abuse of rights doctrine, yet related legal principles have been acknowledged. This article concludes that Icelandic law should recognize the abuse of rights doctrine to complement existing legal doctrines. It also suggests that public interest considerations, including environmental and sustainability concerns, could play a role in shaping an Icelandic abuse of rights doctrine.

European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für PrivatrechtVol. 33(Issue 4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Abuse of Rights in Icelandic Property Law With a Comparative Survey of the Other Nordic Countries — Víðir Smári Petersen · European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS