FUNDAMENTAR A INCERTEZA: O PRINCÍPIO DA PRECAUÇÃO NA REGULAÇÃO DE SUPLEMENTOS ALIMENTARES E SEUS LIMITES EPISTÊMICOS

In the regulation of food supplements, a context marked by scientific uncertainty necessitates the Precautionary Principle (PP) as a crucial yet intricate decision-making tool for potential risks. This article posits that the PP is not a directly ponderable legal principle, but rather a “metanorm” or “second-degree norm” that guides the application of other principles in situations of radical uncertainty and the risk of severe or irreversible harm to health and the environment. This viewpoint critically assesses the rationality of balancing in uncertain scenarios and explores the limitations of the consequentialist approach, bolstered by the reform of the Law of Introduction to the Norms of Brazilian Law (LINDB) , which, without the proper qualification of precaution, may overlook unquantifiable dangers. The conclusion drawn is that the PP’s application demands clarity, well-defined criteria, and proportionality to avert regulatory paralysis or arbitrary prohibitions, thereby balancing the protection of human health and the environment with development and innovation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista fisio&terapia.
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69849/revistaft/ch10202508182128
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FUNDAMENTAR A INCERTEZA: O PRINCÍPIO DA PRECAUÇÃO NA REGULAÇÃO DE SUPLEMENTOS ALIMENTARES E SEUS LIMITES EPISTÊMICOS

Aline Araujo Hamond Costa de Freitas
Revista fisio&terapia.
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

FUNDAMENTAR A INCERTEZA: O PRINCÍPIO DA PRECAUÇÃO NA REGULAÇÃO DE SUPLEMENTOS ALIMENTARES E SEUS LIMITES EPISTÊMICOS

Aline Araujo Hamond Costa de Freitas
article en

Abstract

In the regulation of food supplements, a context marked by scientific uncertainty necessitates the Precautionary Principle (PP) as a crucial yet intricate decision-making tool for potential risks. This article posits that the PP is not a directly ponderable legal principle, but rather a “metanorm” or “second-degree norm” that guides the application of other principles in situations of radical uncertainty and the risk of severe or irreversible harm to health and the environment. This viewpoint critically assesses the rationality of balancing in uncertain scenarios and explores the limitations of the consequentialist approach, bolstered by the reform of the Law of Introduction to the Norms of Brazilian Law (LINDB) , which, without the proper qualification of precaution, may overlook unquantifiable dangers. The conclusion drawn is that the PP’s application demands clarity, well-defined criteria, and proportionality to avert regulatory paralysis or arbitrary prohibitions, thereby balancing the protection of human health and the environment with development and innovation.

Revista fisio&terapia.
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.