Impact of intervention timing on clinical outcomes in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: Analysis of treatment delays and neurological prognosis

To evaluate the impact of intervention timing on clinical outcomes in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs) and analyze the relationship between treatment delay and neurological prognosis. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 198 patients with RIAs who underwent endovascular intervention in our neurosurgery department from January 2021 to March 2024. Patients were divided into early intervention group (≤72 hours, n=116) and delayed intervention group (>72 hours, n=82) based on the time interval from bleeding to endovascular treatment. Demographic characteristics, clinical presentations, Hunt-Hess grades, Fisher grades, aneurysm characteristics, surgical details, complications, length of hospital stay, and follow-up data were collected. The primary outcome measure was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge and 6-month follow-up, while secondary outcomes included angiographic results, rebleeding rate, vasospasm incidence, and mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that, after adjusting for confounding factors such as age, Hunt-Hess grade, Fisher grade, aneurysm size, and location, patients in the early intervention group had significantly higher odds of achieving favorable clinical outcomes (mRS≤2) compared to the delayed intervention group (OR=0.56, 95%CI: 0.37-0.85, P=0.007). The early intervention group had significantly lower rebleeding rates than the delayed intervention group (3.4% vs. 8.5%, P=0.018) and shorter hospital stays (15.2±5.8 days vs. 20.7±6.9 days, P<0.001). Vasospasm incidence was higher in the delayed intervention group (30.5% vs. 19.8%, P=0.012). Multivariate analysis identified Hunt-Hess grade ≥4 (OR=3.42, 95%CI: 2.05-5.71, P<0.001), intervention delay >72 hours (OR=1.78, 95%CI: 1.16-2.73, P=0.008), and age >65 years (OR=1.69, 95%CI: 1.10-2.58, P=0.016) as independent risk factors for poor neurological outcomes. Our findings suggest that early (≤72 hours) endovascular intervention for patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms is associated with better neurological outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Problems in Surgery
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpsurg.2025.101872
Primary Topic
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of intervention timing on clinical outcomes in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: Analysis of treatment delays and neurological prognosis

Frank Yonghong Li, Deyu Pan, Guangbiao Li, Hua Chen et al.
Current Problems in Surgery
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
article

Impact of intervention timing on clinical outcomes in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: Analysis of treatment delays and neurological prognosis

Frank Yonghong Li, Deyu Pan, Guangbiao Li, Hua Chen, Gang Wu, Jingquan Li, Huafang Hu
article en

Abstract

To evaluate the impact of intervention timing on clinical outcomes in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs) and analyze the relationship between treatment delay and neurological prognosis. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 198 patients with RIAs who underwent endovascular intervention in our neurosurgery department from January 2021 to March 2024. Patients were divided into early intervention group (≤72 hours, n=116) and delayed intervention group (>72 hours, n=82) based on the time interval from bleeding to endovascular treatment. Demographic characteristics, clinical presentations, Hunt-Hess grades, Fisher grades, aneurysm characteristics, surgical details, complications, length of hospital stay, and follow-up data were collected. The primary outcome measure was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge and 6-month follow-up, while secondary outcomes included angiographic results, rebleeding rate, vasospasm incidence, and mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that, after adjusting for confounding factors such as age, Hunt-Hess grade, Fisher grade, aneurysm size, and location, patients in the early intervention group had significantly higher odds of achieving favorable clinical outcomes (mRS≤2) compared to the delayed intervention group (OR=0.56, 95%CI: 0.37-0.85, P=0.007). The early intervention group had significantly lower rebleeding rates than the delayed intervention group (3.4% vs. 8.5%, P=0.018) and shorter hospital stays (15.2±5.8 days vs. 20.7±6.9 days, P<0.001). Vasospasm incidence was higher in the delayed intervention group (30.5% vs. 19.8%, P=0.012). Multivariate analysis identified Hunt-Hess grade ≥4 (OR=3.42, 95%CI: 2.05-5.71, P<0.001), intervention delay >72 hours (OR=1.78, 95%CI: 1.16-2.73, P=0.008), and age >65 years (OR=1.69, 95%CI: 1.10-2.58, P=0.016) as independent risk factors for poor neurological outcomes. Our findings suggest that early (≤72 hours) endovascular intervention for patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms is associated with better neurological outcomes.

Current Problems in SurgeryVol. 72
Liuzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital (CN), Liuzhou General Hospital (CN), Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.