Novel milk ingredient blend in nursery pig diets did not improve growth performance and survival compared to control diets without or with spray-dried plasma

Three experiments evaluated the effects of a novel milk ingredient blend (FXP) in phase 1 and 2 nursery pig diets on growth performance, diarrhea score, and survival. In Experiment 1, pigs were fed a 3-phase nursery regimen, with phases 1, 2, and 3 lasting 10, 11, and 6 days, respectively. Treatments included a control diet in each phase (CONTROL), 4% spray-dried plasma (SDP) in phase 1 followed by the CONTROL diet in phases 2 and 3 (SDP), and 0.5% FXP in phases 1 and 2, followed by the CONTROL diet in phase 3 (FXP). There were 8, 9, and 10 pens assigned to the CONTROL, SDP, and FXP treatments, respectively. Pigs fed SDP during phase 1 had greater (P < 0.05) average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and average body weight (BW) on day 10 than pigs fed the CONTROL or FXP treatments, and a greater (P < 0.05) gain-to-feed ratio (G:F) than pigs fed the FXP diet. In Experiment 2, the 3-phase nursery feed regimen consisted of diets fed for 11, 10, and 21 days in phases 1 to 3, respectively, using the same treatments as in Experiment 1: CONTROL, 4% SDP in phase 1 only, and 1% FXP in phases 1 and 2. Each treatment included 12 pens. Pigs fed SDP in phase 1 had significantly greater (P < 0.05) ADG, ADFI, and BW on day 11 than those fed CONTROL or FXP diets. Cumulative mortality by day 21 was higher (P < 0.05) for pigs fed FXP compared with CONTROL and SDP, and fecal score was lower (P < 0.05) for SDP compared with CONTROL. In Experiment 3, pigs were assigned to either a CONTROL or FXP group, with 0.5% FXP included only in phases 1 and 2. Phases 1 to 3 lasted 11, 12, and 19 days, respectively. Each treatment was assigned to 64 pens of 25–26 pigs per pen. Pigs fed FXP had a higher (P < 0.05) removal rate during phase 3 than the CONTROL. Overall, there were no benefits from feeding 0.5% to 1% FXP on pig growth performance, diarrhea incidence, or survival based on the results from these experiments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Animal Science
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2025.1648283
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Novel milk ingredient blend in nursery pig diets did not improve growth performance and survival compared to control diets without or with spray-dried plasma

Hans H Stein, Joe Crenshaw, Javier Polo, Sung Woo Kim et al.
Frontiers in Animal Science
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

Novel milk ingredient blend in nursery pig diets did not improve growth performance and survival compared to control diets without or with spray-dried plasma

Hans H Stein, Joe Crenshaw, Javier Polo, Sung Woo Kim, Yanbin Shen
article en

Abstract

Three experiments evaluated the effects of a novel milk ingredient blend (FXP) in phase 1 and 2 nursery pig diets on growth performance, diarrhea score, and survival. In Experiment 1, pigs were fed a 3-phase nursery regimen, with phases 1, 2, and 3 lasting 10, 11, and 6 days, respectively. Treatments included a control diet in each phase (CONTROL), 4% spray-dried plasma (SDP) in phase 1 followed by the CONTROL diet in phases 2 and 3 (SDP), and 0.5% FXP in phases 1 and 2, followed by the CONTROL diet in phase 3 (FXP). There were 8, 9, and 10 pens assigned to the CONTROL, SDP, and FXP treatments, respectively. Pigs fed SDP during phase 1 had greater (P < 0.05) average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and average body weight (BW) on day 10 than pigs fed the CONTROL or FXP treatments, and a greater (P < 0.05) gain-to-feed ratio (G:F) than pigs fed the FXP diet. In Experiment 2, the 3-phase nursery feed regimen consisted of diets fed for 11, 10, and 21 days in phases 1 to 3, respectively, using the same treatments as in Experiment 1: CONTROL, 4% SDP in phase 1 only, and 1% FXP in phases 1 and 2. Each treatment included 12 pens. Pigs fed SDP in phase 1 had significantly greater (P < 0.05) ADG, ADFI, and BW on day 11 than those fed CONTROL or FXP diets. Cumulative mortality by day 21 was higher (P < 0.05) for pigs fed FXP compared with CONTROL and SDP, and fecal score was lower (P < 0.05) for SDP compared with CONTROL. In Experiment 3, pigs were assigned to either a CONTROL or FXP group, with 0.5% FXP included only in phases 1 and 2. Phases 1 to 3 lasted 11, 12, and 19 days, respectively. Each treatment was assigned to 64 pens of 25–26 pigs per pen. Pigs fed FXP had a higher (P < 0.05) removal rate during phase 3 than the CONTROL. Overall, there were no benefits from feeding 0.5% to 1% FXP on pig growth performance, diarrhea incidence, or survival based on the results from these experiments.

Frontiers in Animal ScienceVol. 6
North Carolina State University (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Iowa Soybean Association (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.