A comparison of clinical outcomes following kyphoplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction Kyphoplasty is a minimally invasive treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) aimed at restoring vertebral height and alleviating pain. However, despite its widespread use, kyphoplasty outcomes are typically analyzed without distinguishing between thoracic and lumbar regions. Given the anatomical and biomechanical differences between these regions, it is crucial to compare the efficacy and complication rates of kyphoplasty based on spinal location. This review seeks to evaluate these distinctions and explore their potential clinical implications to inform patient expectations and procedural understanding. Methods A comprehensive search strategy was developed using concepts of kyphoplasty, compression fractures, and spinal regions. Resulting literature underwent title, abstract, and full-text screening using the inclusion criteria: (1) Patients underwent kyphoplasty for osteoporotic VCFs of the thoracic and lumbar spine, (2) Clinical, perioperative, or postoperative outcome measures were available, and (3) Outcome measures were subcategorized into thoracic or lumbar spinal regions. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. The ROBINS-I tool was used to evaluate bias. Results Twenty-five manuscripts were included in final analysis. Meta-analysis revealed operative time and injected cement volume were 43.07 minutes [95% CI (35.34, 50.79)] and 4.61 ml [95% CI (3.79, 5.43)] in the lumbar spine and 56.42 min [95% CI (41.03, 71.81)] and 4.25 ml [95% CI (3.56, 4.93)] in the thoracic spine, respectively. Likewise, the incidence of cement leakage and subsequent adjacent level fractures were 13% [95% CI (7%, 22%)] and 5% [95% CI (2%, 12%)] in the lumbar spine and 19% [95% CI (10%, 32%)] and 10% [95% CI (2%, 33%)] in the thoracic spine, respectively. Lastly, the post-operative decrease in visual analog scale pain was 5.59 [95% CI (5.23, 5.94)] in the lumbar spine and 5.49 [95% CI (4.79, 6.19)] in the thoracic spine. Across studies, the primary risk of bias was due to confounding variables, resulting in a serious risk of bias in 12 studies (48.0%). Discussion Kyphoplasty provides comparable outcomes in thoracic and lumbar VCFs, with no clinically significant differences in pain relief or procedural effectiveness. Despite anatomical differences, the procedure remains safe and effective in both regions, warranting further research on spinal region-specific outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmscd.2025.1597288
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of clinical outcomes following kyphoplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Rahul Ramanathan, Richard A. Wawrose, Joon Y. Lee, S. Lutes et al.
Frontiers in Musculoskeletal Disorders
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

A comparison of clinical outcomes following kyphoplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Rahul Ramanathan, Richard A. Wawrose, Joon Y. Lee, S. Lutes, Christopher J. Como, Michael J. Spitnale, Christopher Gonzalez, Julia Martins de Oliveira, C Cisneros, Vivek Sharma, Ting Zou, Timothy Edwards, Michael R. Kann
article en

Abstract

Introduction Kyphoplasty is a minimally invasive treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) aimed at restoring vertebral height and alleviating pain. However, despite its widespread use, kyphoplasty outcomes are typically analyzed without distinguishing between thoracic and lumbar regions. Given the anatomical and biomechanical differences between these regions, it is crucial to compare the efficacy and complication rates of kyphoplasty based on spinal location. This review seeks to evaluate these distinctions and explore their potential clinical implications to inform patient expectations and procedural understanding. Methods A comprehensive search strategy was developed using concepts of kyphoplasty, compression fractures, and spinal regions. Resulting literature underwent title, abstract, and full-text screening using the inclusion criteria: (1) Patients underwent kyphoplasty for osteoporotic VCFs of the thoracic and lumbar spine, (2) Clinical, perioperative, or postoperative outcome measures were available, and (3) Outcome measures were subcategorized into thoracic or lumbar spinal regions. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. The ROBINS-I tool was used to evaluate bias. Results Twenty-five manuscripts were included in final analysis. Meta-analysis revealed operative time and injected cement volume were 43.07 minutes [95% CI (35.34, 50.79)] and 4.61 ml [95% CI (3.79, 5.43)] in the lumbar spine and 56.42 min [95% CI (41.03, 71.81)] and 4.25 ml [95% CI (3.56, 4.93)] in the thoracic spine, respectively. Likewise, the incidence of cement leakage and subsequent adjacent level fractures were 13% [95% CI (7%, 22%)] and 5% [95% CI (2%, 12%)] in the lumbar spine and 19% [95% CI (10%, 32%)] and 10% [95% CI (2%, 33%)] in the thoracic spine, respectively. Lastly, the post-operative decrease in visual analog scale pain was 5.59 [95% CI (5.23, 5.94)] in the lumbar spine and 5.49 [95% CI (4.79, 6.19)] in the thoracic spine. Across studies, the primary risk of bias was due to confounding variables, resulting in a serious risk of bias in 12 studies (48.0%). Discussion Kyphoplasty provides comparable outcomes in thoracic and lumbar VCFs, with no clinically significant differences in pain relief or procedural effectiveness. Despite anatomical differences, the procedure remains safe and effective in both regions, warranting further research on spinal region-specific outcomes.

Frontiers in Musculoskeletal DisordersVol. 3
Nova Southeastern University (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Greater Pittsburgh Orthopaedic Associates (US), Bethel University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.