Migrants in interethnic partnerships: Between preferences and structural opportunities

This paper explores the individual characteristics of migrants in interethnic partnerships living in Germany. Our analyses examine key characteristics extracted from the partner market theory and compare them among interethnic (migrant-native) and intraethnic (migrant-migrant) couples. This approach enables us to learn more about the role of cultural boundaries in the social integration processes of different migrant groups. We go beyond earlier research by focusing not on migrant-native contrasts but on variations within the migrant population, including a comparison of Turkish migrants and ethnic German resettlers, which are the two largest migrant groups in Germany; and by including religion, marital status, and spatial perspectives in our analyses. We also extend prior work by including non-marital partnerships. Our empirical analyses are based on migrant adults aged 14–48. In a first step, we present descriptive findings on the prevalence of interethnic partnerships in our sample. In a second step, we estimate the outcome variable (migrants in interethnic vs. intraethnic partnerships) using cross-sectional regression analyses. The models focus on compositional differences between immigrant groups concerning size and place of residence, education, migrant status, ethnicity, religiosity, sex, relationship status, and age. Our findings support the theoretical elaborations on interethnic partner markets, namely, that preferences and structural opportunities characterize migrants in interethnic partnerships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Intercultural Relations
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102263
Primary Topic
Migration and Labor Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Migrants in interethnic partnerships: Between preferences and structural opportunities

Anne‐Kristin Kuhnt, Monika Obersneider
International Journal of Intercultural Relations
Migration and Labor Dynamics
article

Migrants in interethnic partnerships: Between preferences and structural opportunities

Anne‐Kristin Kuhnt, Monika Obersneider
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the individual characteristics of migrants in interethnic partnerships living in Germany. Our analyses examine key characteristics extracted from the partner market theory and compare them among interethnic (migrant-native) and intraethnic (migrant-migrant) couples. This approach enables us to learn more about the role of cultural boundaries in the social integration processes of different migrant groups. We go beyond earlier research by focusing not on migrant-native contrasts but on variations within the migrant population, including a comparison of Turkish migrants and ethnic German resettlers, which are the two largest migrant groups in Germany; and by including religion, marital status, and spatial perspectives in our analyses. We also extend prior work by including non-marital partnerships. Our empirical analyses are based on migrant adults aged 14–48. In a first step, we present descriptive findings on the prevalence of interethnic partnerships in our sample. In a second step, we estimate the outcome variable (migrants in interethnic vs. intraethnic partnerships) using cross-sectional regression analyses. The models focus on compositional differences between immigrant groups concerning size and place of residence, education, migrant status, ethnicity, religiosity, sex, relationship status, and age. Our findings support the theoretical elaborations on interethnic partner markets, namely, that preferences and structural opportunities characterize migrants in interethnic partnerships.

International Journal of Intercultural RelationsVol. 108
University of Rostock (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Migration and Labor Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.