Continuity amid change: Explaining budgetary choices in the national implementation of EU cohesion policy funds

At first glance, the implementation of EU funds should be fluctuating with economic or political demands. However, this quantitative analysis shows that the national implementation is instead characterised by policy continuity. National governments largely adhere to the same budgetary choices as in previous periods when implementing cohesion policy funds, independent of changing political and economic circumstances at the national level. Additionally, countries with a longer implementation experience show more policy continuity. These findings suggest that self-reinforcing dynamics develop not only for domestic funds but also in the EU multi-level governance context. In addition to policy continuity, EU-wide trends were found to matter in the broad national programmatic orientation. When policy continuity prevails, the resulting rigidity can threaten the effectiveness and responsiveness of EU funds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Union Politics
Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165251365553
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Regional Development and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Continuity amid change: Explaining budgetary choices in the national implementation of EU cohesion policy funds

Romy Hansum
1 citations
European Union Politics
Regional Development and Policy
8.52
article

Continuity amid change: Explaining budgetary choices in the national implementation of EU cohesion policy funds

Romy Hansum
article en
1 citations

Abstract

At first glance, the implementation of EU funds should be fluctuating with economic or political demands. However, this quantitative analysis shows that the national implementation is instead characterised by policy continuity. National governments largely adhere to the same budgetary choices as in previous periods when implementing cohesion policy funds, independent of changing political and economic circumstances at the national level. Additionally, countries with a longer implementation experience show more policy continuity. These findings suggest that self-reinforcing dynamics develop not only for domestic funds but also in the EU multi-level governance context. In addition to policy continuity, EU-wide trends were found to matter in the broad national programmatic orientation. When policy continuity prevails, the resulting rigidity can threaten the effectiveness and responsiveness of EU funds.

European Union PoliticsVol. 26(4)
Hertie School (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Regional Development and Policy
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Continuity amid change: Explaining budgetary choices in the national implementation of EU cohesion policy funds — Romy Hansum · European Union Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS