A Reconstructive Stance to Analyzing Op-Ed Writing as Resistance to “Divisive Concepts” Legislation

Recognizing writing as a powerful form of political resistance, in this article the authors demonstrate how reconstructive discourse analysis (RDA) can be used to make visible how one individual used public media writing to advance movements of educational justice. Combining RDA with theories of argumentation and positioning to analyze an op-ed opposing “divisive concepts” legislation in Indiana, the authors illustrate how the op-ed author constructed the proposed bill as irrational while positioning himself as an authority on the topic. RDA can inform researchers seeking methodological tools to analyze such resistance and practitioners (including teachers, parents, students, and activists) seeking examples of successful forms of resistance. In this article, we demonstrate through one case how literacy researchers can support educators in sustaining their work for racial justice through reconstructive analyses that make visible possibilities of challenging attempts to constrain justice-oriented teaching and learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Literacy Research Theory Method and Practice
Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377251358189
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Reconstructive Stance to Analyzing Op-Ed Writing as Resistance to “Divisive Concepts” Legislation

Melissa Schieble, Laura A. Taylor, Amy Vetter, Michiko Hikida et al.
Literacy Research Theory Method and Practice
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

A Reconstructive Stance to Analyzing Op-Ed Writing as Resistance to “Divisive Concepts” Legislation

Melissa Schieble, Laura A. Taylor, Amy Vetter, Michiko Hikida, Kushya Sugarman, Kristen Hodnett
article en

Abstract

Recognizing writing as a powerful form of political resistance, in this article the authors demonstrate how reconstructive discourse analysis (RDA) can be used to make visible how one individual used public media writing to advance movements of educational justice. Combining RDA with theories of argumentation and positioning to analyze an op-ed opposing “divisive concepts” legislation in Indiana, the authors illustrate how the op-ed author constructed the proposed bill as irrational while positioning himself as an authority on the topic. RDA can inform researchers seeking methodological tools to analyze such resistance and practitioners (including teachers, parents, students, and activists) seeking examples of successful forms of resistance. In this article, we demonstrate through one case how literacy researchers can support educators in sustaining their work for racial justice through reconstructive analyses that make visible possibilities of challenging attempts to constrain justice-oriented teaching and learning.

Literacy Research Theory Method and Practice
Rhodes College (US), The Graduate Center, CUNY (US), University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US), Hunter College (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Spencer Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Reconstructive Stance to Analyzing Op-Ed Writing as Resistance to “Divisive Concepts” Legislation — Melissa Schieble, Laura A. Taylor, et al. · Literacy Research Theory Method and Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS