Diagnostic Accuracy of a Large Language Model (ChatGPT-4) for Patients Admitted to a Community Hospital Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Case Study

BackgroundThe future of artificial intelligence in medicine includes the use of machine learning and large language models to improve diagnostic accuracy, as a point-of-care tool, at the time of admission to an acute care hospital. The large language model, ChatGPT-4, has been shown to diagnose complex medical conditions with accuracies comparable to experienced clinicians, however, most published studies involved curated cases or examination-like questions and are not point-of-care. To test the hypothesis that ChatGPT-4 can make an accurate medical diagnosis using real-world medical cases and a convenient cut and paste strategy, we performed a retrospective case study involving critically ill patients admitted to a community hospital medical intensive care unit.MethodsA redacted H&P was essentially cut and pasted into ChatGPT-4 with uniform instructions to make a leading diagnosis and a list of 5 possibilities as a differential diagnosis. All features that could be used to identify patients were removed to ensure privacy and HIPAA compliance. The ChatGPT-4 diagnoses were compared with critical care physician diagnoses using a blinded longitudinal chart review as the ground truth diagnosis.ResultsA total of 120 randomly selected cases were included in the study. The diagnostic accuracy was 88.3% for physicians and 85.0% for ChatGPT-4, with no significant difference by McNemar testing (p-value of 0.249). The agreement between physician diagnosis and ChatGPT-4 diagnosis was moderate, 0.57 (95% CI: 0.35-0.79), based on Cohen's kappa statistic.ConclusionThese results suggest that ChatGTP-4 achieved diagnostic accuracy comparable to board certified physicians in the context of critically ill patients admitted to a community medical intensive care unit. Furthermore, the agreement was only moderate, suggesting that there may be complementary ways of combining the diagnostic acumen of physicians and ChatGPT-4 to improve overall accuracy. A prospective study would be necessary to determine if ChatGPT-4 could improve patient outcomes as a point-of-care tool at the time of admission.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251368270
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Accuracy of a Large Language Model (ChatGPT-4) for Patients Admitted to a Community Hospital Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Case Study

Shihla Shireen Kanamgode, June Ellis, Eric S. Silverman, Warren Fernandes et al.
1 citations
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Diagnostic Accuracy of a Large Language Model (ChatGPT-4) for Patients Admitted to a Community Hospital Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Case Study

Shihla Shireen Kanamgode, June Ellis, Eric S. Silverman, Warren Fernandes, Rhea Bohra, Rajaeaswaran Chinnamuthu, Vaibhavi Mukhtiar, Jassimran Singh, Charmi Bhanushali
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BackgroundThe future of artificial intelligence in medicine includes the use of machine learning and large language models to improve diagnostic accuracy, as a point-of-care tool, at the time of admission to an acute care hospital. The large language model, ChatGPT-4, has been shown to diagnose complex medical conditions with accuracies comparable to experienced clinicians, however, most published studies involved curated cases or examination-like questions and are not point-of-care. To test the hypothesis that ChatGPT-4 can make an accurate medical diagnosis using real-world medical cases and a convenient cut and paste strategy, we performed a retrospective case study involving critically ill patients admitted to a community hospital medical intensive care unit.MethodsA redacted H&P was essentially cut and pasted into ChatGPT-4 with uniform instructions to make a leading diagnosis and a list of 5 possibilities as a differential diagnosis. All features that could be used to identify patients were removed to ensure privacy and HIPAA compliance. The ChatGPT-4 diagnoses were compared with critical care physician diagnoses using a blinded longitudinal chart review as the ground truth diagnosis.ResultsA total of 120 randomly selected cases were included in the study. The diagnostic accuracy was 88.3% for physicians and 85.0% for ChatGPT-4, with no significant difference by McNemar testing (p-value of 0.249). The agreement between physician diagnosis and ChatGPT-4 diagnosis was moderate, 0.57 (95% CI: 0.35-0.79), based on Cohen's kappa statistic.ConclusionThese results suggest that ChatGTP-4 achieved diagnostic accuracy comparable to board certified physicians in the context of critically ill patients admitted to a community medical intensive care unit. Furthermore, the agreement was only moderate, suggesting that there may be complementary ways of combining the diagnostic acumen of physicians and ChatGPT-4 to improve overall accuracy. A prospective study would be necessary to determine if ChatGPT-4 could improve patient outcomes as a point-of-care tool at the time of admission.

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
UMass Memorial Health Care (US), Saint Vincent Hospital (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.