Architectures of knowledge: Grounding social work theory within philosophy of science

Summary This article reflects on the relevance and necessity of a scientific foundation and reflection of social work. Beginning with introductory considerations on the relevance of theories and the need for their scientific reflection, the special role of the philosophy of science and the basic science positions are presented. Against this background, further conclusions are drawn about the knowledge architectures of social work and special considerations are given on the question of comparability and systematization of theories. The key role of the epistemological goals of theories is introduced and used as a central criterion for comparing theories. The article concludes with a summary and an outlook. Findings In recent decades, several theoretical models of social work have been developed and discussed. They have helped to organize and to reflect on social work as a profession and a discipline. At the same time, the theoretical approaches often remain separate and are rarely compared systematically. One of the main reasons for this situation are the different theoretical references that make direct comparison difficult and sometimes impossible. In order to overcome this situation, this article develops criteria for a comparative classification of social work theories and their systematization according to the model of basic scientific positions and their epistemological goals derived from the philosophy of science. Application This article helps to reflect on role of theories for social work and to compare, select, and assess theories; it illuminates the theory–practice relationship; and it contributes to the further development of the science of social work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social Work
Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173251353085
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Architectures of knowledge: Grounding social work theory within philosophy of science

Christian Spatscheck, Stefan Borrmann
Journal of Social Work
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Architectures of knowledge: Grounding social work theory within philosophy of science

Christian Spatscheck, Stefan Borrmann
article en

Abstract

Summary This article reflects on the relevance and necessity of a scientific foundation and reflection of social work. Beginning with introductory considerations on the relevance of theories and the need for their scientific reflection, the special role of the philosophy of science and the basic science positions are presented. Against this background, further conclusions are drawn about the knowledge architectures of social work and special considerations are given on the question of comparability and systematization of theories. The key role of the epistemological goals of theories is introduced and used as a central criterion for comparing theories. The article concludes with a summary and an outlook. Findings In recent decades, several theoretical models of social work have been developed and discussed. They have helped to organize and to reflect on social work as a profession and a discipline. At the same time, the theoretical approaches often remain separate and are rarely compared systematically. One of the main reasons for this situation are the different theoretical references that make direct comparison difficult and sometimes impossible. In order to overcome this situation, this article develops criteria for a comparative classification of social work theories and their systematization according to the model of basic scientific positions and their epistemological goals derived from the philosophy of science. Application This article helps to reflect on role of theories for social work and to compare, select, and assess theories; it illuminates the theory–practice relationship; and it contributes to the further development of the science of social work.

Journal of Social Work
Hochschule Bremen (DE), University of Applied Sciences Landshut (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.