Promise‐Keeping Reputations in an Investment Game: An Experimental Investigation

ABSTRACT We design a controlled laboratory experiment to mitigate moral hazard problems in livestream shopping when sellers make promises to buyers. In our experiment, the promise‐keeping reputation mechanism allows sellers to send promises to buyers while buyers can observe the sellers' historical promise‐keeping records. Results demonstrate that bare promises under the mechanism significantly enhance trust and trustworthiness. Specifically, bare promises under the promise‐keeping reputation mechanism can build trust quickly between buyers and sellers in the beginning; when sellers have a good reputation for promise‐keeping, buyers will trust sellers more. When sellers' promise‐keeping histories are not recorded, bare promises fail to enhance trust or trustworthiness, as buyers cannot distinguish between trustworthy sellers and opportunistic sellers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Studies of Economics
Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ise3.70016
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Promise‐Keeping Reputations in an Investment Game: An Experimental Investigation

Ninghua Du, Qun Zhao
International Studies of Economics
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Promise‐Keeping Reputations in an Investment Game: An Experimental Investigation

Ninghua Du, Qun Zhao
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We design a controlled laboratory experiment to mitigate moral hazard problems in livestream shopping when sellers make promises to buyers. In our experiment, the promise‐keeping reputation mechanism allows sellers to send promises to buyers while buyers can observe the sellers' historical promise‐keeping records. Results demonstrate that bare promises under the mechanism significantly enhance trust and trustworthiness. Specifically, bare promises under the promise‐keeping reputation mechanism can build trust quickly between buyers and sellers in the beginning; when sellers have a good reputation for promise‐keeping, buyers will trust sellers more. When sellers' promise‐keeping histories are not recorded, bare promises fail to enhance trust or trustworthiness, as buyers cannot distinguish between trustworthy sellers and opportunistic sellers.

International Studies of Economics
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Promise‐Keeping Reputations in an Investment Game: An Experimental Investigation — Ninghua Du, Qun Zhao · International Studies of Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS