Evaluating OPUF's Role in Health State Valuations: Strengths, Limitations, and Comparative Analysis

This article examines the Online Elicitation of Personal Utility Functions (OPUF) method as a novel approach for health state valuation. While OPUF offers a structured, modular alternative to traditional methods, it also presents notable challenges. Chief among these is its reliance on compositional trade-offs between health dimensions (e.g., pain, mobility, anxiety), which may inadequately reflect how individuals experience health holistically. Additionally, OPUF's use of numerical rating scales does not guarantee that resulting utility values exhibit interval properties-a requirement for robust interpretation in economic evaluations. To contextualize OPUF within the broader landscape of valuation methods, this article introduces a classification scheme outlining alternative approaches and their respective trade-offs in terms of precision, cognitive burden, and feasibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Economics
Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70027
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating OPUF's Role in Health State Valuations: Strengths, Limitations, and Comparative Analysis

Afschin Gandjour
Health Economics
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Evaluating OPUF's Role in Health State Valuations: Strengths, Limitations, and Comparative Analysis

Afschin Gandjour
article en

Abstract

This article examines the Online Elicitation of Personal Utility Functions (OPUF) method as a novel approach for health state valuation. While OPUF offers a structured, modular alternative to traditional methods, it also presents notable challenges. Chief among these is its reliance on compositional trade-offs between health dimensions (e.g., pain, mobility, anxiety), which may inadequately reflect how individuals experience health holistically. Additionally, OPUF's use of numerical rating scales does not guarantee that resulting utility values exhibit interval properties-a requirement for robust interpretation in economic evaluations. To contextualize OPUF within the broader landscape of valuation methods, this article introduces a classification scheme outlining alternative approaches and their respective trade-offs in terms of precision, cognitive burden, and feasibility.

Health EconomicsVol. 34(12)
Frankfurt School of Finance & Management (DE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.