Delineating retention tree groups based on open spatial data and ecosystem service indicators

Forest harvesting can result in biodiversity loss, removal of carbon stocks, and habitat fragmentation. Leaving retention trees during harvesting is a practical solution to mitigate these effects. However, no planning method is available for optimizing different ecological benefits of retention trees. We developed a geospatial retention tree tool (ReTreeT) to plan locations for retention tree groups based on ecosystem service values. ReTreeT integrates ecosystem service indicators with a spatial clustering method to delineate hotspots of ecosystem service indicators that favor habitat provision and retention of carbon stock, associated with retention tree groups. Indicators we evaluated included tree species diversity, tree height heterogeneity, dead wood potential, and depth-to-water index. We generated proposals for retention tree groups based on the mapped ecosystem service hotspot values. We compared ReTreeT derived ecosystem service indicators to indicators calculated from realized retention tree groups at forestry sites through field measurements in Finland. The ReTreeT-proposed retention tree groups exhibited higher ecosystem service values than realized retention tree groups. Ecosystem service values in realized retention tree groups tended to represent average conditions in the harvest area. We compared ecosystem service values derived from remote sensing data with field measured data that confirmed the reliability of dead wood potential estimates, while enhancing tree diversity metrics could further improve ReTreeT’s performance. • We developed the ReTreeT for delineating retention tree groups. • ReTreeT clusters retention trees based on hotspots of ecosystem service indicator. • We compared indicator values in clusters and typical retention areas of harvesting. • Comparison was implemented in conifer dominated areas of Finland. • Delineated cluster outperformed typical retention tree area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Ecology and Management
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123041
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Delineating retention tree groups based on open spatial data and ecosystem service indicators

Kirsi Riekki, Mikko Kesälä, Jukka Malinen, Ari Laurén et al.
Forest Ecology and Management
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Delineating retention tree groups based on open spatial data and ecosystem service indicators

Kirsi Riekki, Mikko Kesälä, Jukka Malinen, Ari Laurén, Marjo Palviainen
article en

Abstract

Forest harvesting can result in biodiversity loss, removal of carbon stocks, and habitat fragmentation. Leaving retention trees during harvesting is a practical solution to mitigate these effects. However, no planning method is available for optimizing different ecological benefits of retention trees. We developed a geospatial retention tree tool (ReTreeT) to plan locations for retention tree groups based on ecosystem service values. ReTreeT integrates ecosystem service indicators with a spatial clustering method to delineate hotspots of ecosystem service indicators that favor habitat provision and retention of carbon stock, associated with retention tree groups. Indicators we evaluated included tree species diversity, tree height heterogeneity, dead wood potential, and depth-to-water index. We generated proposals for retention tree groups based on the mapped ecosystem service hotspot values. We compared ReTreeT derived ecosystem service indicators to indicators calculated from realized retention tree groups at forestry sites through field measurements in Finland. The ReTreeT-proposed retention tree groups exhibited higher ecosystem service values than realized retention tree groups. Ecosystem service values in realized retention tree groups tended to represent average conditions in the harvest area. We compared ecosystem service values derived from remote sensing data with field measured data that confirmed the reliability of dead wood potential estimates, while enhancing tree diversity metrics could further improve ReTreeT’s performance. • We developed the ReTreeT for delineating retention tree groups. • ReTreeT clusters retention trees based on hotspots of ecosystem service indicator. • We compared indicator values in clusters and typical retention areas of harvesting. • Comparison was implemented in conifer dominated areas of Finland. • Delineated cluster outperformed typical retention tree area.

Forest Ecology and ManagementVol. 596
University of Helsinki (FI), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Helsinki Institute of Physics (FI), Metsähallitus (Finland) (FI)
Helsingin Yliopisto
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.