Predicting shoreline changes using deep learning techniques with Bayesian optimisation

Accurate prediction of shoreline change is vital for effective coastal planning and management, especially under increasing climate variabilities. This study explores the applicability of deep learning (DL) techniques, particularly Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Network-LSTM (CNN-LSTM) models, for shoreline forecasting at monthly to inter-annual timescales, under two modelling approaches—direct input (DI) and autoregressive (AR). All models demonstrated the ability to reproduce temporal shoreline variability, while the autoregressive DL models were performing better. Further, a noise impact assessment revealed that seasonal decomposition and noise filtering significantly enhanced the model performance. In particular, the models using 52-week data decomposition and residual noise reduction improved the model performance. The reduction of data noises also resulted in narrower ensemble prediction envelopes, indicating that ensemble candidate models behave with low diversity. The temporal data resolution analysis showed that lower data resolutions reduce the predictive performance of the model and at least fortnightly data are required to satisfactorily capture the trend of variability of the shoreline position at this beach. The use of ensemble predictions, derived from a selected subset of model trials based on their collective performance, proved beneficial by capturing diverse temporal behaviours, thereby offering a quasi-probabilistic forecast with minimal computational cost. Overall, the study underscores the potential of DL models, particularly with autoregressive architectures, for reliable and transferable shoreline change prediction. It also emphasizes the importance of data quality, resolution, and preprocessing in improving model robustness, laying the groundwork for future research into use of DL in multi-scale shoreline predictions. • Deep Leaning techniques (LSTM, CNN-LSTM) offer a promising approach for shoreline change prediction • Auto-regressive predictions perform marginally better than training models with wave forcing inputs • Bayesian Optimisation provides a computationally efficient model HP optimisation • Reduction of input data noise improves shoreline change predictions, depending on the required timescale of interest • The mean prediction from an ensemble of DL model trials offers a better alternative to the prediction from single ‘best optimised’ DL model

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Coastal Engineering
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2025.104856
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting shoreline changes using deep learning techniques with Bayesian optimisation

Alma Rahat, Rob Lamb, Douglas Pender, Harshinie Karunarathna et al.
3 citations
Coastal Engineering
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
5.01
article

Predicting shoreline changes using deep learning techniques with Bayesian optimisation

Alma Rahat, Rob Lamb, Douglas Pender, Harshinie Karunarathna, Demetra Cristaudo, Tharindu Manamperi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Accurate prediction of shoreline change is vital for effective coastal planning and management, especially under increasing climate variabilities. This study explores the applicability of deep learning (DL) techniques, particularly Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Network-LSTM (CNN-LSTM) models, for shoreline forecasting at monthly to inter-annual timescales, under two modelling approaches—direct input (DI) and autoregressive (AR). All models demonstrated the ability to reproduce temporal shoreline variability, while the autoregressive DL models were performing better. Further, a noise impact assessment revealed that seasonal decomposition and noise filtering significantly enhanced the model performance. In particular, the models using 52-week data decomposition and residual noise reduction improved the model performance. The reduction of data noises also resulted in narrower ensemble prediction envelopes, indicating that ensemble candidate models behave with low diversity. The temporal data resolution analysis showed that lower data resolutions reduce the predictive performance of the model and at least fortnightly data are required to satisfactorily capture the trend of variability of the shoreline position at this beach. The use of ensemble predictions, derived from a selected subset of model trials based on their collective performance, proved beneficial by capturing diverse temporal behaviours, thereby offering a quasi-probabilistic forecast with minimal computational cost. Overall, the study underscores the potential of DL models, particularly with autoregressive architectures, for reliable and transferable shoreline change prediction. It also emphasizes the importance of data quality, resolution, and preprocessing in improving model robustness, laying the groundwork for future research into use of DL in multi-scale shoreline predictions. • Deep Leaning techniques (LSTM, CNN-LSTM) offer a promising approach for shoreline change prediction • Auto-regressive predictions perform marginally better than training models with wave forcing inputs • Bayesian Optimisation provides a computationally efficient model HP optimisation • Reduction of input data noise improves shoreline change predictions, depending on the required timescale of interest • The mean prediction from an ensemble of DL model trials offers a better alternative to the prediction from single ‘best optimised’ DL model

Coastal EngineeringVol. 203
Swansea University (GB), The Communication Trust (GB), PA Consulting Group (GB)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
5.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.