Assessing The Legal Position of Intellectual Property Rights in Artificial Intelligence Works

The development of AI usage raises legal challenges in the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR). One crucial issue is copyright over AI-created works, reflected in various lawsuits in United States and viral case in Indonesia regarding AI altering personal photos in the style of Ghibli anime. This study analyzes: (1)The position of AI as a creator; (2)The position of AI users as creators; and (3)The legal status of AI-produced works. Normative methods used with legislative, analytical, and conceptual approaches. The results show that AI cannot be considered a creator because it does not meet the requirements for a legal subject (intellectuality and legal responsibility), instead AI only seen as a legal object in Indonesia. Additionally, AI users are also not recognized as creators because they do not meet the criteria for originality, fixation, and IPR protection. Therefore, AI works are categorized as being in the public domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alauddin Law Development Journal
Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v7i2.56530
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing The Legal Position of Intellectual Property Rights in Artificial Intelligence Works

Rahmi Ramadhani, Wiwin Wiwin, Muh. Akbar Fhad Syahril, Muhammad Aditya
Alauddin Law Development Journal
Digital Transformation in Law
article

Assessing The Legal Position of Intellectual Property Rights in Artificial Intelligence Works

Rahmi Ramadhani, Wiwin Wiwin, Muh. Akbar Fhad Syahril, Muhammad Aditya
article en

Abstract

The development of AI usage raises legal challenges in the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR). One crucial issue is copyright over AI-created works, reflected in various lawsuits in United States and viral case in Indonesia regarding AI altering personal photos in the style of Ghibli anime. This study analyzes: (1)The position of AI as a creator; (2)The position of AI users as creators; and (3)The legal status of AI-produced works. Normative methods used with legislative, analytical, and conceptual approaches. The results show that AI cannot be considered a creator because it does not meet the requirements for a legal subject (intellectuality and legal responsibility), instead AI only seen as a legal object in Indonesia. Additionally, AI users are also not recognized as creators because they do not meet the criteria for originality, fixation, and IPR protection. Therefore, AI works are categorized as being in the public domain.

Alauddin Law Development JournalVol. 7(2)
Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jakarta (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Digital Transformation in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.