Identifying preferences for sustainability labeling and measures to increase sustainable food consumption among Norwegian consumers

Sustainability includes social, health, and environmental aspects. Sustainability labels enable consumers to make more sustainable food choices. This study assessed how a representative sample of Norwegian consumers valued different sustainability dimensions and identified their preferences for the number of dimensions to include in a potential sustainability label for food, identified groups of consumers who want information regarding different dimensions of sustainability when purchasing food, and identified potential measures to increase sustainable food consumption as part of the NewTools project. Less food waste (53 %) and animal welfare (50 %) were deemed the most important dimensions for a sustainable food system, while reduced meat production (21 %) and organic production (18 %) the least important dimensions. A single label that includes information on social and environmental sustainability and healthiness of food was the most preferred (23 %). Those who perceived that their present diet was sustainable had higher odds of wanting information regarding environmental sustainability (OR 2.91, C·I 1.75, 4.86), social sustainability (OR 3.24, C·I 1.97, 5.31) and health (OR 2.42, C·I 1.33, 4.41) when purchasing food compared to those who perceived that they consumed a less sustainable diet. Finally, the most widely supported measure for increasing sustainable food consumption was lowering prices (57 %) and more time for cooking among those who reported consuming less sustainable diets (20 %). While more comprehensive sustainability labeling is favored, it will likely benefit those who already consume sustainable diets. Future research should investigate measures related to, for example, price and convenience to target less motivated consumers. • Participants who report consuming sustainable diets want more information about sustainability. • A more comprehensive sustainability label depicting more than one dimension was preferred. • Comprehensive food labelling should be researched in combination with structural measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Quality and Preference
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105673
Primary Topic
Organic Food and Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying preferences for sustainability labeling and measures to increase sustainable food consumption among Norwegian consumers

Marianne Morseth, Anne Lene Løvhaug, Laura Terragni, Kaja Lund-Iversen et al.
Food Quality and Preference
Organic Food and Agriculture
article

Identifying preferences for sustainability labeling and measures to increase sustainable food consumption among Norwegian consumers

Marianne Morseth, Anne Lene Løvhaug, Laura Terragni, Kaja Lund-Iversen, Ellen Bjørkum, Aysha Grönberg, Siri Bjerkheim
article en

Abstract

Sustainability includes social, health, and environmental aspects. Sustainability labels enable consumers to make more sustainable food choices. This study assessed how a representative sample of Norwegian consumers valued different sustainability dimensions and identified their preferences for the number of dimensions to include in a potential sustainability label for food, identified groups of consumers who want information regarding different dimensions of sustainability when purchasing food, and identified potential measures to increase sustainable food consumption as part of the NewTools project. Less food waste (53 %) and animal welfare (50 %) were deemed the most important dimensions for a sustainable food system, while reduced meat production (21 %) and organic production (18 %) the least important dimensions. A single label that includes information on social and environmental sustainability and healthiness of food was the most preferred (23 %). Those who perceived that their present diet was sustainable had higher odds of wanting information regarding environmental sustainability (OR 2.91, C·I 1.75, 4.86), social sustainability (OR 3.24, C·I 1.97, 5.31) and health (OR 2.42, C·I 1.33, 4.41) when purchasing food compared to those who perceived that they consumed a less sustainable diet. Finally, the most widely supported measure for increasing sustainable food consumption was lowering prices (57 %) and more time for cooking among those who reported consuming less sustainable diets (20 %). While more comprehensive sustainability labeling is favored, it will likely benefit those who already consume sustainable diets. Future research should investigate measures related to, for example, price and convenience to target less motivated consumers. • Participants who report consuming sustainable diets want more information about sustainability. • A more comprehensive sustainability label depicting more than one dimension was preferred. • Comprehensive food labelling should be researched in combination with structural measures.

Food Quality and PreferenceVol. 134
The Research Council of Norway (NO), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), Universidad Metropolitana (PR)
Norges Forskningsråd
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Organic Food and Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.