Dynamic response of EPS geofoam blocks using vibration tests

Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) geofoams have become a practical geosynthetic for use in roadbeds, soil embankments and retaining walls. Evaluating the dynamic response of EPS blocks is essential for their application under vibration loads. This study used a Foundation Model Response Test (FMRT) apparatus to investigate the dynamic properties of EPS geofoams, of varying densities and thicknesses, under different angular dynamic moments and dead weights. Increasing the density of EPS blocks raised the resonant frequency, equivalent damping ratio and dynamic shear modulus, while reducing the resonant amplitude and dynamic shear strain amplitude. Conversely, increasing their thickness decreased the resonant frequency, equivalent dynamic stiffness and equivalent damping ratio but increased the equivalent shear modulus, resonant amplitude and dynamic shear strain amplitude. With dead weight, thickness and density constant, higher dynamic moments delivered lower resonant frequencies, equivalent dynamic stiffnesses and equivalent shear moduli but higher resonant amplitudes, equivalent dynamic shear strains and equivalent damping ratio values. Adding more dead weight decreased the resonant frequency, resonant amplitude, equivalent dynamic shear strains and equivalent damping ratio, but increased the equivalent dynamic stiffness and equivalent shear modulus. • Evaluating dynamic properties of EPS geofoam blocks using the FMRT Apparatus. • Evaluating wide shear strain range in free and steady-state vibration tests. • Evaluating dynamic properties vs. EPS density and EPS thickness. • Evaluating dynamic properties vs. angular dynamic moment and dead weight.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Construction and Building Materials
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.143180
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic response of EPS geofoam blocks using vibration tests

Andrew Robert Dawson, M. Ahmadi, S.N. Moghaddas Tafreshi, Reza Zakeri et al.
5 links
Construction and Building Materials
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

Dynamic response of EPS geofoam blocks using vibration tests

Andrew Robert Dawson, M. Ahmadi, S.N. Moghaddas Tafreshi, Reza Zakeri, M.A. Noroozzadeh
article en

Abstract

Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) geofoams have become a practical geosynthetic for use in roadbeds, soil embankments and retaining walls. Evaluating the dynamic response of EPS blocks is essential for their application under vibration loads. This study used a Foundation Model Response Test (FMRT) apparatus to investigate the dynamic properties of EPS geofoams, of varying densities and thicknesses, under different angular dynamic moments and dead weights. Increasing the density of EPS blocks raised the resonant frequency, equivalent damping ratio and dynamic shear modulus, while reducing the resonant amplitude and dynamic shear strain amplitude. Conversely, increasing their thickness decreased the resonant frequency, equivalent dynamic stiffness and equivalent damping ratio but increased the equivalent shear modulus, resonant amplitude and dynamic shear strain amplitude. With dead weight, thickness and density constant, higher dynamic moments delivered lower resonant frequencies, equivalent dynamic stiffnesses and equivalent shear moduli but higher resonant amplitudes, equivalent dynamic shear strains and equivalent damping ratio values. Adding more dead weight decreased the resonant frequency, resonant amplitude, equivalent dynamic shear strains and equivalent damping ratio, but increased the equivalent dynamic stiffness and equivalent shear modulus. • Evaluating dynamic properties of EPS geofoam blocks using the FMRT Apparatus. • Evaluating wide shear strain range in free and steady-state vibration tests. • Evaluating dynamic properties vs. EPS density and EPS thickness. • Evaluating dynamic properties vs. angular dynamic moment and dead weight.

Construction and Building MaterialsVol. 493
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dynamic response of EPS geofoam blocks using vibration tests — Andrew Robert Dawson, M. Ahmadi, et al. · Construction and Building Materials (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS