Examining the financial slack–corporate social performance relationship across countries: The influence of formal institutions

Research on the relationship between financial slack and corporate social performance (CSP) provides ambiguous findings and is context-dependent. This study employs institutional theory to address this ambiguity and theorizes how formal institutions influence the relationship between financial slack and CSP. We argue that the relationship between financial slack and CSP is not per se positive or negative but depends on critical formal institutions, namely, government integrity, labor freedom, and financial freedom. Formal institutions define a country's incentive structures and, therefore, affect firms' decisions to allocate financial slack to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities, which impact CSP in turn. Our findings are based on a large dataset of firms across 38 countries. Our multilevel study expands prior research on the financial slack-CSP relationship by demonstrating how the relationship depends on the formal institutional context. Moreover, we contribute to international business research by illustrating how formal institutions in different countries provide incentive structures for firms to allocate financial slack to CSR activities. Finally, our study offers practical implications for firms aiming to improve their CSP and whose operations reach across different country-specific formal institutions across the globe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Management
Published
2025-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2025.101278
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the financial slack–corporate social performance relationship across countries: The influence of formal institutions

Christopher Wickert, Florian B. Zapkau, Michiel De Roo, Tom Elfring et al.
1 citations
Journal of International Management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
article

Examining the financial slack–corporate social performance relationship across countries: The influence of formal institutions

Christopher Wickert, Florian B. Zapkau, Michiel De Roo, Tom Elfring, G. van der Laan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Research on the relationship between financial slack and corporate social performance (CSP) provides ambiguous findings and is context-dependent. This study employs institutional theory to address this ambiguity and theorizes how formal institutions influence the relationship between financial slack and CSP. We argue that the relationship between financial slack and CSP is not per se positive or negative but depends on critical formal institutions, namely, government integrity, labor freedom, and financial freedom. Formal institutions define a country's incentive structures and, therefore, affect firms' decisions to allocate financial slack to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities, which impact CSP in turn. Our findings are based on a large dataset of firms across 38 countries. Our multilevel study expands prior research on the financial slack-CSP relationship by demonstrating how the relationship depends on the formal institutional context. Moreover, we contribute to international business research by illustrating how formal institutions in different countries provide incentive structures for firms to allocate financial slack to CSR activities. Finally, our study offers practical implications for firms aiming to improve their CSP and whose operations reach across different country-specific formal institutions across the globe.

Journal of International ManagementVol. 31(6)
Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT), Tilburg University (NL), Hôpital Jean Jaurès (FR), École de management de Lyon (FR), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.