Wuwei and Eco-Subjugation: Interpreting Laozi’s Principle of Non-Interference for Environmental Liberation

It is no longer new to the global stage that the Anthropocene acknowledges the current profligacy of the capitalist ideology, which has resulted in the harm and abuse suffered by the global environment, which has led to many environmental crises. Having its root in capitalism exploitation and instrumentalism, the Anthropocene can be understood as a form of environmental enslavement, which we argue, requires liberation akin to that once demanded by formerly colonized peoples. To this end, and for ensuring environmental liberation from the grips of over exploitation as it prevails today, this paper examines the concept of Wuwei, a Daoist principle of non-interference, articulated by Laozi. It emphasizes inaction. This paper positions this principle as a foundational framework for ecological praxis and environmental liberation. Contrary to common misreadings that equate Wuwei with passivity or fatalism, this paper reinterprets it as a conscious mode of action that resists coercion, domination, and unsustainable anthropocentrism. In achieving the above, this paper, through the qualitative method of critical analysis, positions Laozi’s philosophy as an early form of ecological wisdom that prioritises attunement over control, restraint over mastery, and humility over intervention. It argues that the principle of Wuwei, as an indigenous knowledge, could help as a radical alternative to the exploitative paradigms that contribute to persistent modern environmental degradation. It posits that environmental liberation is not merely a matter of regulatory policy or scientific innovation, but of metaphysical reorientation, one that allows nature the ontological space to regenerate, flourish, and be. In advancing Wuwei as ecological praxis, the study contributes to a growing body of post-anthropocentric environmental thought and calls for a renewed ethic of dwelling in harmony with the Dao of the Earth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries Social Science
Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemdss.2025.04.2.473
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wuwei and Eco-Subjugation: Interpreting Laozi’s Principle of Non-Interference for Environmental Liberation

Ridwan Ishola MOGAJI, Progress Eniola EMMANUEL Adewale Oluwaseun MOTADEGBE
International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries Social Science
Chinese history and philosophy
article

Wuwei and Eco-Subjugation: Interpreting Laozi’s Principle of Non-Interference for Environmental Liberation

Ridwan Ishola MOGAJI, Progress Eniola EMMANUEL Adewale Oluwaseun MOTADEGBE
article en

Abstract

It is no longer new to the global stage that the Anthropocene acknowledges the current profligacy of the capitalist ideology, which has resulted in the harm and abuse suffered by the global environment, which has led to many environmental crises. Having its root in capitalism exploitation and instrumentalism, the Anthropocene can be understood as a form of environmental enslavement, which we argue, requires liberation akin to that once demanded by formerly colonized peoples. To this end, and for ensuring environmental liberation from the grips of over exploitation as it prevails today, this paper examines the concept of Wuwei, a Daoist principle of non-interference, articulated by Laozi. It emphasizes inaction. This paper positions this principle as a foundational framework for ecological praxis and environmental liberation. Contrary to common misreadings that equate Wuwei with passivity or fatalism, this paper reinterprets it as a conscious mode of action that resists coercion, domination, and unsustainable anthropocentrism. In achieving the above, this paper, through the qualitative method of critical analysis, positions Laozi’s philosophy as an early form of ecological wisdom that prioritises attunement over control, restraint over mastery, and humility over intervention. It argues that the principle of Wuwei, as an indigenous knowledge, could help as a radical alternative to the exploitative paradigms that contribute to persistent modern environmental degradation. It posits that environmental liberation is not merely a matter of regulatory policy or scientific innovation, but of metaphysical reorientation, one that allows nature the ontological space to regenerate, flourish, and be. In advancing Wuwei as ecological praxis, the study contributes to a growing body of post-anthropocentric environmental thought and calls for a renewed ethic of dwelling in harmony with the Dao of the Earth.

International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries Social ScienceVol. 4(2)
Lagos State University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Wuwei and Eco-Subjugation: Interpreting Laozi’s Principle of Non-Interference for Environmental Liberation — Ridwan Ishola MOGAJI, Progress Eniola EMMANUEL Adewale Oluwaseun MOTADEGBE · International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries Social Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS